Intermediate

Agentic workflow: when AI works in several steps

An agentic workflow is a way of using an AI model over several steps: it plans, calls tools, drafts, reviews and corrects, instead of producing its answer in one go. It is how assistants that “get things done” for you actually work.

Data as of October 22, 2026

Key figures

LevelIntermediate
Origin2024
Introduced byAndrew Ng (popularisation, lettre The Batch du 20 mars 2024)

From first draft to working in loops

When you ask an assistant a question, the large language model usually writes its answer straight through, without going back. An agentic workflow changes that: the task is broken into steps, and the model can look something up, try, notice a mistake and try again. Andrew Ng popularized the phrase in his March 20, 2024 letter, describing four patterns: reflection (reviewing its own output), tool use, planning, and collaboration between several agents.

A concrete example

Picture a consultant preparing a briefing on a competitor.

  1. Plan: the model lists the questions to cover (product, public pricing, recent news).
  2. Search: through tool calling, it runs web searches and reads the pages it finds.
  3. Draft: it writes a structured first version.
  4. Check: a second pass compares each claim with the sources and flags anything unsupported.
  5. Fix: the draft is revised, then handed to the consultant.

Each step is simple on its own; chaining them is what makes the result more reliable than a single answer.

Why it matters

This is the shift from AI that answers to AI that carries out work. Anthropic’s guide “Building effective agents”, published in December 2024, lays out common patterns: prompt chaining, routing a request to the right handler, parallelizing, letting an “orchestrator” coordinate workers, and having a second call evaluate the result. These building blocks show up in most automation tools today. Before handing a sensitive task to such a system, our Can I trust an agent with this? tool helps you weigh the risks.

Common mistakes and myths

  • “More steps is always better.” Every step adds cost, latency and another chance to go wrong. Anthropic’s guide recommends starting with the simplest solution that works.
  • “Agentic means autonomous, so no supervision needed.” For irreversible actions (payments, sending emails, deleting files), a human sign-off is still the safe choice.
  • “It always involves several agents.” A single model can follow an agentic workflow; multi-agent setups are just one pattern among others.

Related terms: multi-agent system, human-in-the-loop, AI agent, orchestration.

Related terms

Try it

Full glossary

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between an agentic workflow and an AI agent?

The terms overlap. In its December 2024 guide, Anthropic calls a “workflow” a system whose steps are fixed in advance by code, and an “agent” a system where the model decides what to do next. In everyday use, “agentic workflow” often covers both.

Does an agentic workflow always give better results?

Not always. Extra steps often improve quality on complex tasks, but they cost more tokens and more time. For a simple question, a single request is usually enough.

Do I need to code to build an agentic workflow?

No. No-code tools such as n8n or Make let you chain steps around an AI model. Code frameworks give you more control for advanced cases.

Where does the phrase come from?

Andrew Ng popularized it in his March 20, 2024 letter in The Batch, which contrasted one-shot prompting with iterative work. He described four patterns: reflection, tool use, planning and multi-agent collaboration.

Data sources

Data as of October 22, 2026

Report an error

Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.