Level : Intermediate
Compare AI models side by side
Pick 2 to 4 AI models and see their prices, context window, features and benchmark scores at a glance. This guide explains every row of the comparison tool and helps you choose the right model for your use case.
- GPT-5.5 Pro
- Claude Sonnet 5.5
Comparing 2 models: GPT-5.5 Pro, Claude Sonnet 5.5.
| Criterion | GPT-5.5 ProOpenAI | Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| API price | ||
| Input priceUSD per million tokens | $30.00median of 20 providers | $2.00 (best value) |
| Output priceUSD per million tokens | $180.00median of 20 providers | $10.00 (best value) |
| Window, output and date | ||
| Context windowtokens | 1,050,000 (best value) | 1,000,000 |
| Maximum outputtokens | 100,000 | 128,000 (best value) |
| Release date | Apr 23, 2026 | Sep 28, 2026 (best value) |
| Open weights | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Capabilities | ||
| Tools (function calling) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Reasoning | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Vision (images) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Audio | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Benchmark scores | ||
| Composite indexout of 100, at least 3 benchmarks | 96.9 (best value) | 95.9 |
| GPQA DiamondPhD-level science questions | 93.9% | 95.6% (best value) |
| OTIS Mock AIMEcompetition mathematics problems | 100% | 100% |
| FrontierMathvery hard research-level mathematics | 87.7% | 88.8% (best value) |
| FrontierCodeadvanced programming tasks | — | 52.1% |
| APEX-Agentsprofessional tasks carried out by an agent | — | 75.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exammultidisciplinary expert questions | — | 46.1% |
Verdict by criterion
- Cheapest input: Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Cheapest output: Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Largest context window: GPT-5.5 Pro
- Longest possible output: Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Most recent: Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Best composite index: GPT-5.5 Pro
- Best score on GPQA Diamond: Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Best score on FrontierMath: Claude Sonnet 5.5
Public API prices in USD excluding tax, collected on October 22, 2026. “Median of N providers”: the developer's own price is not in the source, so we use the median price of the providers that serve the model. Index and scores come from the same data as the AI ranking; “—” means the model was not evaluated on that test. The verdict compares figures row by row: it is not a recommendation.
Model comparisons
Frontier models
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.5 Pro
- GPT-5.5 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.5 Pro
- GPT-5.5 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro
- GPT-5.5 Pro vs GPT-6 Sol
- GPT-5.5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro
- GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-5.5
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.5
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Sol
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-5.5
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Astra
- GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6 Sol
- GPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Sol
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.5
- Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Fable 5.1
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Sol
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol
- GPT-5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Sol
- Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5
- Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- GPT-5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol
- GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- GPT-5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
Open-weight models
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Kimi K2.6
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Kimi K3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Kimi K2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM-5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.6 27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GLM-5.1
- Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K2.6
- Kimi K2.5 vs Kimi K2.6
- GLM-5 vs Kimi K2.6
- Kimi K2.6 vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Kimi K2.6
- Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.6 27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K2.6
- GLM-5.1 vs Kimi K2.6
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
- Kimi K2.5 vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5 vs Kimi K3
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Kimi K3
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6 27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.1 vs Kimi K3
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K2.5
- GLM-5 vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6 27B
- GLM-5.3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-5.1 vs GLM-5.3
- GLM-5 vs Kimi K2.5
- Kimi K2.5 vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Kimi K2.5
- Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.6 27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K2.5
- GLM-5.1 vs Kimi K2.5
- GLM-5 vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM-5
- GLM-5 vs Qwen3.6 27B
- GLM-5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- GLM-5 vs GLM-5.1
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Muse Spark Open
- Muse Spark Open vs Qwen3.6 27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Spark Open
- GLM-5.1 vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Qwen3.6 27B
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GLM-5.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.6 27B
- GLM-5.1 vs Qwen3.6 27B
- GLM-5.1 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
Budget models
- GPT-6 Luna vs Muse Spark 1.3
- GPT-5.6 Luna vs Muse Spark 1.3
- GPT-5.4 nano vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.6 Flash
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- GPT-5 Mini vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.5 Flash
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus
- GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-6 Luna
- GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-6 Luna
- GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.6 Flash
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-6 Luna
- GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- GPT-5 Mini vs GPT-6 Luna
- GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 Flash
- GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Plus
- GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-5.6 Luna
- GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.6 Flash
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna
- GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- GPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5 Mini
- GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.5 Flash
- GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen3.7 Plus
- GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3.6 Flash
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.4 nano
- GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- GPT-5.4 nano vs GPT-5 Mini
- GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3.5 Flash
- GPT-5.4 nano vs Qwen3.7 Plus
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.6 Flash
- Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- GPT-5 Mini vs Qwen3.6 Flash
- Qwen3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash
- Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5 Mini
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.5 Flash
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.7 Plus
- GPT-5 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus
- GPT-5 Mini vs Qwen3.5 Flash
- GPT-5 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Plus
- Qwen3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Mid-range models
- Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.7
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Mistral Large 4
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.5
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.8
- Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview
- Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.7
- Claude Opus 4.8 vs Mistral Large 4
- Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 5
- Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Claude Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.5
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok 4.7
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Mistral Large 4
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Sonnet 5
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok 4.5
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Grok 4.7
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Mistral Large 4
Developers' flagship models
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs GPT-5.5 Pro
- GPT-5.5 Pro vs Grok 4.6
- GPT-5.5 Pro vs Kimi K2.6
- GPT-5.5 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.6
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K2.6
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Grok 4.6
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Kimi K2.6
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Grok 4.6
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
- Grok 4.6 vs Kimi K2.6
- Grok 4.6 vs Muse Spark 1.3
- Kimi K2.6 vs Muse Spark 1.3
How to use the comparison tool
Type a few letters of a model’s name in the search box and the list filters instantly. Add 2 to 4 models and their specs line up row by row for easy reading. For each criterion, an automatic verdict flags the model that comes out ahead (cheapest, largest context window, best score, and so on). The share link lets you send your comparison to a colleague or come back to it later.
What each row means
Token. The basic unit a model reads and writes: a fragment of text, often part of a word. Everything is counted in tokens, from pricing to text length. To see how many tokens your text represents, try the token estimator.
Input and output price. Both are shown per million tokens. Input is what you send to the model (your question, a document, the conversation history); output is what it sends back. Output is usually the more expensive of the two.
Context window. The model’s “working memory”: the maximum amount of text it can take into account at once, prompt and documents included. A large window lets you analyze a long report in one go. The context window tool helps you picture what that means.
Max output. The maximum length of a single answer. It is often much shorter than the context window: a model may read a very long document yet only write a reply of limited length.
Features. Tools: the model can call external functions (search, calculations, software), which is essential for building an agent. Reasoning: it can “think” step by step before answering, useful for complex problems. Vision: it understands images. Audio: it handles sound or voice.
Open weights. Weights are the parameters a model learns during training. When they are published, you can download the model and run it on your own servers, which is a game changer for privacy. Otherwise, the model is only available through its maker’s service.
Release date. Handy for spotting recent models, but an older model is often still a great choice if it is cheap and good enough for the job.
Benchmark scores. Results on standardized tests, drawn from the same data as our AI ranking. An empty cell means the model was not evaluated on that test, not that it failed.
How to choose for your use case
- Writing and everyday questions: a budget model is usually enough. Focus on the output price.
- Long document analysis: favor a large context window and check the input price, since that is what adds up when you send lots of text.
- Agents and automations: make sure the tools feature is there, then estimate the bill with the AI agent cost calculator, because an agent makes many calls in a row.
- Sensitive data: an open-weight model, hosted by you or a provider you trust, limits where your data travels. See our pick of open source AI models.
- Hard problems (code, math, logic): the reasoning feature and benchmark scores move to the top of the list.
Common pitfalls
- Only looking at the input price. A model that is cheap on input can get expensive if your answers are long.
- Forgetting reasoning tokens. Models that “think” often generate intermediate tokens, usually billed as output. Your real bill can end up higher than your estimate.
- Assuming a huge context is always fully used. Quality can drop when the window is filled to the brim; send only what is relevant.
- Treating the automatic verdict as advice. It compares figures row by row without knowing your use case. Weighing the criteria is up to you.
- Mixing up models and assistants. If you are looking for a personal subscription, the AI assistants comparison is a better fit.
Frequently asked questions
What is a token, in plain terms?
A token is a small chunk of text, often part of a word, that the model reads or writes. AI models are billed by the number of tokens they process. The exact token count for a given text depends on the model and the language.
Why do output tokens cost more than input tokens?
Generating text takes more computing than reading it, because the model produces its answer token by token. That is why most labs charge more for output than for input. If your use involves long answers, check the output price first.
Are these the prices of ChatGPT Plus or other subscriptions?
No. The comparison tool shows API prices, meaning pay-as-you-go access to the model for developers and automated tools. Consumer assistant subscriptions work differently and are covered in our AI assistants comparison.
Can I share my comparison?
Yes. The share link stores the selected models in the page address. Anyone who opens it sees the same comparison, with data current at the time they view the page.