Claude Opus 5 or GPT-5.5: which to choose?
Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Claude Opus 5 | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Released | July 24, 2026 | April 23, 2026 |
| Capability index | 92.7 / 100 | 89 / 100 |
| Input price | $5 | $5 |
| Output price | $25 | $30 |
| Cost of a typical task | $0.15 | $0.16 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text, image, PDF | text, image, PDF |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2026 | December 1, 2025 |
Two models head to head
This comparison pits two frontier models, the ones you pick when quality comes first against each other: Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.5, one from Anthropic, the other from OpenAI. The first dates from July 24, 2026, the second from April 23, 2026.
All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.
Performance
On our capability index, Claude Opus 5 scores 92.7 out of 100 and GPT-5.5 89. Claude Opus 5 leads by 3.7 points.
On the 5 benchmarks reported for both, Claude Opus 5 wins 3 times and GPT-5.5 2:
- GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): Claude Opus 5 93.9%, GPT-5.5 94%
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): Claude Opus 5 98.9%, GPT-5.5 100%
- FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): Claude Opus 5 85.6%, GPT-5.5 85.3%
- FrontierCode (advanced programming tasks): Claude Opus 5 53.4%, GPT-5.5 43%
- APEX-Agents (professional tasks carried out by an agent): Claude Opus 5 65.8%, GPT-5.5 55.1%
Budget
Claude Opus 5 costs $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 costs $5 and $30.
For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.15 with Claude Opus 5 versus $0.16 with GPT-5.5. The cost is almost the same.
Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.
Context and capabilities
GPT-5.5 reads more in one go: 1,050,000 tokens of context (roughly 1,575 pages), versus 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 5.
Reasoning mode: Claude Opus 5 yes, GPT-5.5 yes. Tool calling: Claude Opus 5 yes, GPT-5.5 yes. Image input: Claude Opus 5 yes, GPT-5.5 yes.
Neither publishes its weights: both are used through an API.
Knowledge cutoff: May 2026 for Claude Opus 5, December 1, 2025 for GPT-5.5.
In short
Our reading of the data:
- Choose Claude Opus 5 for a higher capability index and a more recent release.
This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 5 or GPT-5.5: which is better?
On our index (Epoch AI data), Claude Opus 5 scores 92.7 and GPT-5.5 89 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.
Which one is cheaper?
Claude Opus 5. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.15 with Claude Opus 5 and $0.16 with GPT-5.5 (prices as of October 22, 2026).
Which one has the larger context window?
GPT-5.5, with 1,050,000 tokens versus 1,000,000.
Can I run Claude Opus 5 or GPT-5.5 on my own servers?
No: both are closed models, available through an API.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.