Claude Sonnet 5.5 versus GPT-5.5
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Released | September 28, 2026 | April 23, 2026 |
| Capability index | 95.9 / 100 | 89 / 100 |
| Input price | $2 | $5 |
| Output price | $10 | $30 |
| Cost of a typical task | $0.06 | $0.16 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text, image, PDF | text, image, PDF |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | December 1, 2025 |
What are we comparing?
This comparison pits two frontier models, the ones you pick when quality comes first against each other: Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-5.5, one from Anthropic, the other from OpenAI. The first dates from September 28, 2026, the second from April 23, 2026.
All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.
Which one is more capable?
On our capability index, Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 95.9 out of 100 and GPT-5.5 89. Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads by 6.9 points.
On the 5 benchmarks reported for both, Claude Sonnet 5.5 wins 4 times and GPT-5.5 0:
- GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): Claude Sonnet 5.5 95.6%, GPT-5.5 94%
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): Claude Sonnet 5.5 100%, GPT-5.5 100%
- FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): Claude Sonnet 5.5 88.8%, GPT-5.5 85.3%
- FrontierCode (advanced programming tasks): Claude Sonnet 5.5 52.1%, GPT-5.5 43%
- APEX-Agents (professional tasks carried out by an agent): Claude Sonnet 5.5 75.5%, GPT-5.5 55.1%
Budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 costs $5 and $30.
For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.06 with Claude Sonnet 5.5 versus $0.16 with GPT-5.5. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 2.7 times cheaper, a gap that adds up quickly over 1,000 tasks: $100 difference.
Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.
Context and capabilities
GPT-5.5 reads more in one go: 1,050,000 tokens of context (roughly 1,575 pages), versus 1,000,000 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
Reasoning mode: Claude Sonnet 5.5 yes, GPT-5.5 yes. Tool calling: Claude Sonnet 5.5 yes, GPT-5.5 yes. Image input: Claude Sonnet 5.5 yes, GPT-5.5 yes.
Neither publishes its weights: both are used through an API.
Knowledge cutoff: June 2026 for Claude Sonnet 5.5, December 1, 2025 for GPT-5.5.
In short
Our reading of the data:
- Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for a higher capability index, a lower cost and a more recent release.
This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5.5: which is better?
On our index (Epoch AI data), Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 95.9 and GPT-5.5 89 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.
Which one is cheaper?
Claude Sonnet 5.5. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.06 with Claude Sonnet 5.5 and $0.16 with GPT-5.5 (prices as of October 22, 2026).
Which one has the larger context window?
GPT-5.5, with 1,050,000 tokens versus 1,000,000.
Can I run Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-5.5 on my own servers?
No: both are closed models, available through an API.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.