Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Released | September 28, 2026 | September 4, 2026 |
| Capability index | 95.9 / 100 | 94.7 / 100 |
| Input price | $2 | $10 |
| Output price | $10 | $50 |
| Cost of a typical task | $0.06 | $0.30 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text, image, PDF | text, image, PDF |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | April 30, 2026 |
The match-up at a glance
Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra are two frontier models, the ones you pick when quality comes first, one from Anthropic, the other from OpenAI. Claude Sonnet 5.5 was released on September 28, 2026, GPT-6 Astra on September 4, 2026.
All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.
Performance
On our capability index, Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 95.9 out of 100 and GPT-6 Astra 94.7. Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads by 1.2 points.
On the 6 benchmarks reported for both, Claude Sonnet 5.5 wins 1 time and GPT-6 Astra 4:
- GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): Claude Sonnet 5.5 95.6%, GPT-6 Astra 95.8%
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): Claude Sonnet 5.5 100%, GPT-6 Astra 100%
- FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): Claude Sonnet 5.5 88.8%, GPT-6 Astra 93.7%
- FrontierCode (advanced programming tasks): Claude Sonnet 5.5 52.1%, GPT-6 Astra 53.3%
- APEX-Agents (professional tasks carried out by an agent): Claude Sonnet 5.5 75.5%, GPT-6 Astra 64.7%
- Humanity's Last Exam (multidisciplinary expert questions): Claude Sonnet 5.5 46.1%, GPT-6 Astra 54.8%
Budget
Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Astra costs $10 and $50.
For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.06 with Claude Sonnet 5.5 versus $0.30 with GPT-6 Astra. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 5 times cheaper, a gap that adds up quickly over 1,000 tasks: $240 difference.
Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.
Features and limits
GPT-6 Astra reads more in one go: 1,050,000 tokens of context (roughly 1,575 pages), versus 1,000,000 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
Reasoning mode: Claude Sonnet 5.5 yes, GPT-6 Astra yes. Tool calling: Claude Sonnet 5.5 yes, GPT-6 Astra yes. Image input: Claude Sonnet 5.5 yes, GPT-6 Astra yes.
Neither publishes its weights: both are used through an API.
Knowledge cutoff: June 2026 for Claude Sonnet 5.5, April 30, 2026 for GPT-6 Astra.
In short
Our reading of the data:
- Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for a higher capability index and a lower cost.
This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6 Astra: which is better?
On our index (Epoch AI data), Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 95.9 and GPT-6 Astra 94.7 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.
Which one is cheaper?
Claude Sonnet 5.5. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.06 with Claude Sonnet 5.5 and $0.30 with GPT-6 Astra (prices as of October 22, 2026).
Which one has the larger context window?
GPT-6 Astra, with 1,050,000 tokens versus 1,000,000.
Can I run Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6 Astra on my own servers?
No: both are closed models, available through an API.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.