GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max 0902
GPT-5.5 Pro (OpenAI) and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3.8 Max 0902 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | Alibaba Cloud (Qwen) |
| Released | April 23, 2026 | September 2, 2026 |
| Capability index | 96.9 / 100 | 88.4 / 100 |
| Input price | $30 | $2 |
| Output price | $180 | $6 |
| Cost of a typical task | $0.96 | $0.052 |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 100,000 tokens | 50,000 tokens |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text, image, PDF | text, image, video, PDF |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Knowledge cutoff | December 1, 2025 | Not disclosed |
What are we comparing?
This comparison pits two frontier models, the ones you pick when quality comes first against each other: GPT-5.5 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max 0902, one from OpenAI, the other from Alibaba Cloud (Qwen). The first dates from April 23, 2026, the second from September 2, 2026.
All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.
Performance
On our capability index, GPT-5.5 Pro scores 96.9 out of 100 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 88.4. GPT-5.5 Pro leads by 8.5 points.
On the 3 benchmarks reported for both, GPT-5.5 Pro wins 2 times and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 0:
- GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): GPT-5.5 Pro 93.9%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 92.3%
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): GPT-5.5 Pro 100%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 100%
- FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): GPT-5.5 Pro 87.7%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 65.6%
Pricing
GPT-5.5 Pro costs $30 per million input tokens and $180 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max 0902 costs $2 and $6.
For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.96 with GPT-5.5 Pro versus $0.052 with Qwen3.8 Max 0902. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 is 18.5 times cheaper, a gap that adds up quickly over 1,000 tasks: $908 difference.
Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.
Under the hood
GPT-5.5 Pro reads more in one go: 1,050,000 tokens of context (roughly 1,575 pages), versus 1,000,000 for Qwen3.8 Max 0902.
Reasoning mode: GPT-5.5 Pro yes, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 yes. Tool calling: GPT-5.5 Pro yes, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 yes. Image input: GPT-5.5 Pro yes, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 yes.
Neither publishes its weights: both are used through an API.
In short
Our reading of the data:
- Choose GPT-5.5 Pro for a higher capability index.
- Choose Qwen3.8 Max 0902 for a lower cost and a more recent release.
This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.5 Pro or Qwen3.8 Max 0902: which is better?
On our index (Epoch AI data), GPT-5.5 Pro scores 96.9 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 88.4 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.
Which one is cheaper?
Qwen3.8 Max 0902. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.96 with GPT-5.5 Pro and $0.052 with Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (prices as of October 22, 2026).
Which one has the larger context window?
GPT-5.5 Pro, with 1,050,000 tokens versus 1,000,000.
Can I run GPT-5.5 Pro or Qwen3.8 Max 0902 on my own servers?
No: both are closed models, available through an API.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.