Agent infrastructure · agent infrastructure component
Cognee: review, pricing, security and alternatives
Cognee is an open-source agent infrastructure component published by Cognee, in the agent infrastructure family. Cognee turns data into persistent agent memory by combining knowledge graphs with vector-based information retrieval. Its repository has 32,717 stars and its last commit is from October 16, 2026.
| Adoption (stars) | 30/40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Activity (commits, releases) | 30/30 | |
| Framework (licence, control, models) | 25/30 |
What Cognee does
Cognee belongs to the agent infrastructure family: technical building blocks for agents: memory, execution sandboxes, model gateways, observability, evaluation. On our grid it ranks #5 of the 28 projects of this family listed in the directory.
It is not an agent in itself: it is a component other agents use (memory, isolated execution, web access, model gateway or monitoring). You pick it based on the agent or framework it has to equip.
You use it from: developer SDK and API. Usable models: any OpenAI-compatible model. It can run on your own machine or server.
Who is Cognee for?
It is for teams running agents in production that need a reliable component: isolated execution, memory, model gateway or observability. Typical tasks people give it:
- isolate code generated by an agent
- track model call costs and errors
- give an agent long-term memory
It is a good candidate if your data must stay on your machines.
Access and human control
Its documentation does not detail the access granted to the agent: check the settings before connecting it to your accounts.
We could not establish whether it asks for human approval before sensitive actions: test it first on an unimportant account or folder.
Cognee pricing
The code is free, under the Apache-2.0 licence.
Getting started with Cognee
- Install it: the project ships as a Python package (install with
piporuv). The exact command is in the repository README. - Start with the minimal example from the docs, then add one tool at a time and check what the agent does with it.
- Give it a short, checkable task, review the result and its action log, then raise the difficulty step by step.
Security: risk level
An infrastructure component sees prompts, keys and data pass through: self-host it or read the service's retention policy.
Three habits: least privilege (minimal rights, dedicated keys), human approval for irreversible actions, a sandbox for code execution. The AI agent security check reviews your setup in a few minutes.
Project activity and releases
Created on August 16, 2023, the topoteretes/cognee repository has 32,717 stars, 3,411 forks and 721 open issues, with 11,602 commits in total. It received changes this month.
Over the last 52 weeks: 8,394 commits, an average of 161.4 per week.
157 releases in total; 23 in the last twelve months. Latest release: v1.6.6rc1, on October 23, 2026.
Cognee vs other agent infrastructure
GitHub stars of the best-rated open-source projects in the agent infrastructure family. Stars measure attention, not quality: a heavily promoted project collects them fast, a specialised tool will have few.
Cognee and other agent infrastructure at a glance
The 7 best-ranked agents in the same family, 7 of them open source. The score out of 100 only applies to open-source projects; for proprietary services we show the published entry price. A dash marks information the documentation does not state.
| Agent | Model | Score | Stars or entry price | Self-hostable | Human approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognee | open source | 85 | 32.7K ★ | yes | – |
| OmniRoute | open source | 90 | 80.7K ★ | yes | – |
| Mem0 | open source | 89 | 67.7K ★ | yes | – |
| Firecrawl | open source | 86 | 194.9K ★ | yes | – |
| Claude-Mem | open source | 86 | 102.8K ★ | yes | – |
| 9Router | open source | 85 | 31.3K ★ | yes | – |
| Hyperframes | open source | 84 | 71.3K ★ | yes | – |
| Crawl4AI | open source | 83 | 86.2K ★ | yes | – |
How we rated it
Score: 85/100, computed only from public, verifiable data, with no subjective testing or partnership:
- Adoption 30/40: 32,717 stars on a log scale (40 points from about 200,000).
- Activity 30/30: last commit less than a month ago, 23 releases in six months, 8,394 commits in a year.
- Framework 25/30: licence, default human approval, self-hosting, model choice and documentation site.
The score does not say whether the agent will succeed at your tasks: it measures how solid the project is. The full grid is on the method page.
Verdict
Cognee is one of the most solid projects in its family: followed, active and well framed.
Strengths
- Widely followed: 32.7K stars
- Very active development
- Frequent releases (23 in a year)
- Can run on your side: data under control
- Free choice of model
Alternatives
- OmniRoute80.7K ★
- Mem067.7K ★
- Firecrawl194.9K ★
- Claude-Mem102.8K ★
- 9Router31.3K ★
- Hyperframes71.3K ★
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
Is Cognee free?
The software is free (Apache-2.0 licence). You still pay for the model calls, unless you use a local model.
Is Cognee safe?
Our risk level: low. Give it minimum rights and approve irreversible actions.
Which models does Cognee use?
According to its documentation: any OpenAI-compatible model.
Can Cognee be installed on your own server?
Yes, from the topoteretes/cognee repository. Data then stays with you, but security and updates are your job.
What are the alternatives to Cognee?
In the same family: OmniRoute, Mem0, Firecrawl, and Claude-Mem.
Cognee or OmniRoute: what is the difference?
Both belong to the agent infrastructure family. Cognee has 32.7K stars against 80.7K for OmniRoute. The right choice mostly depends on the access you are willing to give it.
Related articles
- Open source or proprietary AI agent: how to decideOctober 25, 2026
- AI agent vs. chatbot: what's the difference?October 24, 2026
- Autonomous AI agents: how much should you let them do?October 12, 2026
- AI agent memory: how agents remember (and forget)October 11, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score