Claude Opus 5.5: pricing, context and performance
Claude Opus 5.5 in numbers: price per token, context window, independent benchmark scores and comparable models, based on public data checked on October 22, 2026.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Key figures
| Developer | Anthropic |
|---|---|
| Released | September 22, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (≈ 1,500 pages) |
| Maximum output | 128,000 tokens |
| Input price | $4 per million tokens (developer's price) |
| Output price | $20 per million tokens |
| Open weights | No |
| Reasoning mode | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes |
| Structured output (JSON) | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text, image, PDF |
| Providers offering it | 37 |
| Capability index | 95.9 / 100 |
| Ranking position | #2 |
What you need to know
Claude Opus 5.5 is a language model from Anthropic, released on September 22, 2026. It is a very recent release. Its weights are not published, so it only runs remotely, through the Anthropic API or partner hosts (37 listed on models.dev). It has a reasoning mode: it can "think" before answering, which helps with multi-step problems but uses more tokens, and therefore more money.
We file it under frontier models (24 models in this category on the site).
What it costs
Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens (developer's price, checked on October 22, 2026).
In practice, an agent task that reads 20,000 tokens and writes 2,000 costs about $0.12, or $120 for 1,000 such tasks.
That is 1.4 times the median output price of frontier models ($14.5).
Tokens read back from cache cost $0.20 per million, which helps an agent that keeps resending the same context.
To estimate your own budget, use the agent cost calculator.
What do independent benchmarks say?
According to results published by Epoch AI (checked on October 22, 2026), Claude Opus 5.5 has a capability index of 95.9 out of 100, computed on 5 benchmarks from our basket.
That puts it at #2 in our weekly model ranking.
- GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): 90.6% — the best tracked model, Gemini 4 Argon, reaches 96.4%
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): 100% — the best tracked model, GPT-5.5 Pro, reaches 100%
- FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): 91.2% — the best tracked model, GPT-6 Astra, reaches 93.7%
- FrontierCode (advanced programming tasks): 54.6% — best score among tracked models
Context and capabilities
Its context window reaches 1,000,000 tokens, roughly 1,500 pages of text at 500 words per page: enough to load a whole book or a mid-sized codebase. A single answer can run to 128,000 tokens.
It accepts as input: text, image and PDF. Its knowledge stops at June 2026: beyond that, it needs web search or your documents.
It can call tools (functions, APIs) and return structured JSON output, which makes it a possible foundation for an AI agent.
When to choose it
Given its category, Claude Opus 5.5 is mainly aimed at hard tasks where quality matters more than cost: deep reasoning, complex code, long analyses.
Its FrontierCode result (54.6%, above the median of tracked models) makes it a serious candidate for coding agents.
Its very large context window makes it worth considering for analysing large sets of documents in a single request.
Before adopting it, test it on your own examples: benchmarks measure standard tasks, not your job.
Comparable models
In the same category, the models closest to Claude Opus 5.5 are:
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic, index 95.9) — see the comparison
- Gemini 4 Argon (Google DeepMind, index 95.3) — see the comparison
- GPT-5.5 Pro (OpenAI, index 96.9) — see the comparison
- GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI, index 94.7) — see the comparison
Independent benchmark scores
| Benchmark | What it measures | Score |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | PhD-level science questions | 90.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | competition mathematics problems | 100% |
| FrontierMath | very hard research-level mathematics | 91.2% |
| FrontierCode | advanced programming tasks | 54.6% |
| APEX-Agents | professional tasks carried out by an agent | 73.5% |
Similar models
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 · Anthropic · index 95.9 · Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Gemini 4 Argon · Google DeepMind · index 95.3 · Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 4 Argon
- GPT-5.5 Pro · OpenAI · index 96.9 · Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-5.5 Pro
- GPT-6 Astra · OpenAI · index 94.7 · Compare Claude Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra
Comparisons
Other Anthropic models
- Claude Haiku 5.5 · October 7, 2026
- Claude Fable 5.1 · September 1, 2026
- Claude Opus 5 · July 24, 2026
- Claude Sonnet 5 · June 30, 2026
- Claude Fable 5 · June 9, 2026
- Claude Opus 4.8 · May 28, 2026
Frequently asked questions
How much does Claude Opus 5.5 cost?
As of October 22, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens (developer's price). A task that reads 20,000 tokens and writes 2,000 costs about $0.12.
What is the context window of Claude Opus 5.5?
1,000,000 tokens, roughly 1,500 pages of text. An answer can reach 128,000 tokens.
Is Claude Opus 5.5 open source?
No. It is a closed Anthropic model, available only through an API.
How good is Claude Opus 5.5?
Its capability index is 95.9 out of 100 (5 benchmarks, Epoch AI data). It ranks #2 in our weekly ranking.
Can you build an agent with Claude Opus 5.5?
Yes: it can call tools and return structured JSON, the two basic building blocks of an agent.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
- Epoch AI — Data on AI Models — Epoch AI, “Data on AI Models”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.