Personal assistants · AI agent
Leon: review, pricing, security and alternatives
Leon is an open-source AI agent published by Leon AI, in the personal assistants family. Leon is a self-hosted personal assistant that combines voice interactions and installable skills to carry out tasks. Its repository has 17,600 stars and its last commit is from October 24, 2026.
What Leon does
Leon belongs to the personal assistants family: general-purpose agents, often self-hosted and driven from a messaging app, that act for you on your files, accounts and services. On our grid it ranks #15 of the 46 projects of this family listed in the directory.
You use it from: web app. Usable models: local models (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM…). It can run on your own machine or server.
Who is Leon for?
It targets individuals and freelancers who want an assistant able to act for them day to day, often from a messaging app. Typical tasks people give it:
- sort e-mail and draft replies
- manage a calendar and reminders
- look up information and summarise it
- run small recurring tasks
It is a good candidate if you prefer doing everything in a browser, with no install, your data must stay on your machines, and you want the option of a local model, with no API fees.
Access and human control
Its documentation does not detail the access granted to the agent: check the settings before connecting it to your accounts.
We could not establish whether it asks for human approval before sensitive actions: test it first on an unimportant account or folder.
Leon pricing
The code is free, under the MIT licence.
Getting started with Leon
- Install it: the project ships as a Node.js package (install with
npm, or run directly withnpx). The exact command is in the repository README. - Pick the model: an API key from a provider, or a local model if your machine has enough graphics memory (the VRAM calculator tells you).
- Give it a first playground with nothing at stake: a test folder, a secondary account or a throwaway project. Only open your real accounts once you have seen how it behaves.
- Give it a short, checkable task, review the result and its action log, then raise the difficulty step by step.
Security: risk level
A personal assistant often combines access to private data, reading outside content and sending messages: the combination that enables data leaks through prompt injection.
Three habits: least privilege (minimal rights, dedicated keys), human approval for irreversible actions, a sandbox for code execution. The AI agent security check reviews your setup in a few minutes.
Project activity and releases
Created on February 10, 2019, the leon-ai/leon repository has 17,600 stars, 1,477 forks and 95 open issues, with 3,123 commits in total. It received changes this month.
Over the last 52 weeks: 1,133 commits, an average of 21.8 per week.
The project publishes no numbered releases on GitHub: you install it from the main branch or a package manager.
Leon vs other personal assistants
GitHub stars of the best-rated open-source projects in the personal assistants family. Stars measure attention, not quality: a heavily promoted project collects them fast, a specialised tool will have few.
Leon and other personal assistants at a glance
The 7 best-ranked agents in the same family, 7 of them open source. The score out of 100 only applies to open-source projects; for proprietary services we show the published entry price. A dash marks information the documentation does not state.
| Agent | Model | Score | Stars or entry price | Self-hostable | Human approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leon | open source | 72 | 17.6K ★ | yes | – |
| OpenClaw | open source | 95 | 392.9K ★ | yes | – |
| Hermes Agent | open source | 90 | 256.7K ★ | yes | – |
| nanobot | open source | 87 | 49.3K ★ | yes | – |
| CowAgent | open source | 87 | 47.6K ★ | yes | – |
| QwenPaw | open source | 86 | 36K ★ | yes | – |
| ZeroClaw | open source | 85 | 33K ★ | yes | – |
| OpenHuman | open source | 82 | 42.3K ★ | yes | – |
How we rated it
Score: 72/100, computed only from public, verifiable data, with no subjective testing or partnership:
- Adoption 27/40: 17,600 stars on a log scale (40 points from about 200,000).
- Activity 20/30: last commit less than a month ago, 0 releases in six months, 1,133 commits in a year.
- Framework 25/30: licence, default human approval, self-hosting, model choice and documentation site.
The score does not say whether the agent will succeed at your tasks: it measures how solid the project is. The full grid is on the method page.
Verdict
Leon is a serious option; check the limitations below before granting it access.
Strengths
- Very active development
- Can run on your side: data under control
- Free choice of model
- Permissive licence (MIT)
Limitations
- Tied to a single model provider (local models (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM…))
Alternatives
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
Is Leon free?
The software is free (MIT licence). You still pay for the model calls, unless you use a local model.
Is Leon safe?
Our risk level: low. Give it minimum rights and approve irreversible actions.
Which models does Leon use?
According to its documentation: local models (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM…).
Can Leon be installed on your own server?
Yes, from the leon-ai/leon repository. Data then stays with you, but security and updates are your job.
What are the alternatives to Leon?
In the same family: OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, nanobot, and CowAgent.
Leon or OpenClaw: what is the difference?
Both belong to the personal assistants family. Leon has 17.6K stars against 392.9K for OpenClaw. The right choice mostly depends on the access you are willing to give it.
Related articles
- Open source or proprietary AI agent: how to decideOctober 25, 2026
- AI agent vs. chatbot: what's the difference?October 24, 2026
- Autonomous AI agents: how much should you let them do?October 12, 2026
- AI agent memory: how agents remember (and forget)October 11, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score