Computer use · agent framework
Midscene: review, pricing, security and alternatives
Midscene is an open-source agent framework published by Web Infra, in the computer use family. Midscene uses visual understanding of interfaces to automate actions and end-to-end tests from natural language instructions. Its repository has 15,380 stars and its last commit is from October 23, 2026.
What Midscene does
Midscene belongs to the computer use family: agents that see the screen and drive the keyboard and mouse of a computer or phone. On our grid it ranks #1 of the 17 projects of this family listed in the directory.
Unlike a ready-made agent, a framework provides the parts to build one: tool calling, step sequencing, memory, coordination of several agents. It is aimed at teams that want a custom agent.
You use it from: developer SDK and terminal (CLI). Usable models: GPT (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), and Qwen (Alibaba). It can run on your own machine or server.
Who is Midscene for?
It is for people who want to automate desktop software with no API, by driving the screen as a person would. Typical tasks people give it:
- chain actions in legacy business software
- copy data from one application to another
- test a desktop application
It is a good candidate if you are comfortable in a terminal and your data must stay on your machines.
Access and human control
A framework has no access of its own: the tools you plug in define what the agent can do. Start with read-only tools.
We could not establish whether it asks for human approval before sensitive actions: test it first on an unimportant account or folder.
Midscene pricing
The code is free, under the MIT licence.
Getting started with Midscene
- Install it: the project ships as a Node.js package (install with
npm, or run directly withnpx). The exact command is in the repository README. - Create an API key with the model provider and put it in an environment variable, never in a shared or versioned file.
- Start with the minimal example from the docs, then add one tool at a time and check what the agent does with it.
- Give it a short, checkable task, review the result and its action log, then raise the difficulty step by step.
Security: risk level
An agent that controls the computer has the same rights as you: run it in a dedicated virtual machine.
Three habits: least privilege (minimal rights, dedicated keys), human approval for irreversible actions, a sandbox for code execution. The AI agent security check reviews your setup in a few minutes.
Project activity and releases
Created on July 23, 2024, the web-infra-dev/midscene repository has 15,380 stars, 1,201 forks and 44 open issues, with 2,408 commits in total. It received changes this month.
Over the last 52 weeks: 1,354 commits, an average of 26 per week.
221 releases in total; 30 in the last twelve months. Latest release: v1.17.0, on October 23, 2026.
Midscene vs other computer use
GitHub stars of the best-rated open-source projects in the computer use family. Stars measure attention, not quality: a heavily promoted project collects them fast, a specialised tool will have few.
Midscene and other computer use at a glance
The 7 best-ranked agents in the same family, 7 of them open source. The score out of 100 only applies to open-source projects; for proprietary services we show the published entry price. A dash marks information the documentation does not state.
| Agent | Model | Score | Stars or entry price | Self-hostable | Human approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midscene | open source | 81 | 15.4K ★ | yes | – |
| Cua | open source | 80 | 30.9K ★ | yes | – |
| Mobilerun | open source | 79 | 9.8K ★ | yes | – |
| GenericAgent | open source | 73 | 14.3K ★ | yes | – |
| OpenBot | open source | 72 | 7K ★ | yes | – |
| UI-TARS Desktop | open source | 71 | 39.4K ★ | yes | – |
| OpenMausBot | open source | 71 | 5.5K ★ | yes | – |
| Observer | open source | 70 | 1.7K ★ | yes | – |
How we rated it
Score: 81/100, computed only from public, verifiable data, with no subjective testing or partnership:
- Adoption 26/40: 15,380 stars on a log scale (40 points from about 200,000).
- Activity 30/30: last commit less than a month ago, 30 releases in six months, 1,354 commits in a year.
- Framework 25/30: licence, default human approval, self-hosting, model choice and documentation site.
The score does not say whether the agent will succeed at your tasks: it measures how solid the project is. The full grid is on the method page.
Verdict
Midscene is one of the most solid projects in its family: followed, active and well framed.
Strengths
- Very active development
- Frequent releases (30 in a year)
- Can run on your side: data under control
- Free choice of model
- Permissive licence (MIT)
Limitations
- Requires programming skills
Avoid if…
- You want a ready-made agent, without code
Alternatives
- Cua30.9K ★
- Mobilerun9.8K ★
- GenericAgent14.3K ★
- OpenBot7K ★
- UI-TARS Desktop39.4K ★
- OpenMausBot5.5K ★
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
Is Midscene free?
The software is free (MIT licence). You still pay for the model calls, unless you use a local model.
Is Midscene safe?
Our risk level: low. Give it minimum rights and approve irreversible actions.
Which models does Midscene use?
According to its documentation: GPT (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), and Qwen (Alibaba).
Can Midscene be installed on your own server?
Yes, from the web-infra-dev/midscene repository. Data then stays with you, but security and updates are your job.
What are the alternatives to Midscene?
In the same family: Cua, Mobilerun, GenericAgent, and OpenBot.
Midscene or Cua: what is the difference?
Both belong to the computer use family. Midscene has 15.4K stars against 30.9K for Cua. The right choice mostly depends on the access you are willing to give it.
Related articles
- Open source or proprietary AI agent: how to decideOctober 25, 2026
- AI agent vs. chatbot: what's the difference?October 24, 2026
- Autonomous AI agents: how much should you let them do?October 12, 2026
- AI agent memory: how agents remember (and forget)October 11, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score