Automation · AI agent
OpenManus: review, pricing, security and alternatives
OpenManus is an open-source AI agent published by FoundationAgents, in the automation family. An open source general-purpose agent that plans tasks and uses coding and browser tools to carry them out. Its repository has 58,764 stars and its last commit is from August 16, 2026.
What OpenManus does
OpenManus belongs to the automation family: platforms, often visual, that chain steps, apps and models into workflows with or without an agent. On our grid it ranks #14 of the 26 projects of this family listed in the directory.
You use it from: terminal (CLI). Usable models: GPT (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic), and any OpenAI-compatible model. It can run on your own machine or server.
Who is OpenManus for?
It is for teams that want to connect their tools (CRM, e-mail, spreadsheets) and hand the AI the steps that require reading or deciding. Typical tasks people give it:
- qualify incoming requests and route them
- extract data from documents into a spreadsheet
- generate periodic reports
It is a good candidate if you are comfortable in a terminal and your data must stay on your machines.
Access and human control
According to its documentation, OpenManus can:
- run commands in a terminal
- read and edit files
- drive a web browser
- call online services and APIs
We could not establish whether it asks for human approval before sensitive actions: test it first on an unimportant account or folder.
OpenManus pricing
The code is free, under the MIT licence.
Getting started with OpenManus
- Install it: the project ships as a Python package (install with
piporuv). The exact command is in the repository README. - Create an API key with the model provider and put it in an environment variable, never in a shared or versioned file.
- Give it a first playground with nothing at stake: a test folder, a secondary account or a throwaway project. Only open your real accounts once you have seen how it behaves.
- Give it a short, checkable task, review the result and its action log, then raise the difficulty step by step.
Security: risk level
A workflow runs unattended: limit the credentials it holds and log what it sends.
Points found for OpenManus:
- Sensitive access: it can run commands in a terminal, with no established default human approval.
- Outside content: it reads web pages or API responses, which may contain booby-trapped instructions (prompt injection).
Three habits: least privilege (minimal rights, dedicated keys), human approval for irreversible actions, a sandbox for code execution. The AI agent security check reviews your setup in a few minutes.
Project activity and releases
Created on March 6, 2025, the FoundationAgents/OpenManus repository has 58,764 stars, 10,186 forks and 233 open issues, with 535 commits in total. Last change 2 months ago.
Over the last 52 weeks: 10 commits, an average of 0.2 per week.
3 releases in total; 0 in the last twelve months. Latest release: v0.3.0, on April 10, 2025.
OpenManus vs other automation
GitHub stars of the best-rated open-source projects in the automation family. Stars measure attention, not quality: a heavily promoted project collects them fast, a specialised tool will have few.
OpenManus and other automation at a glance
The 7 best-ranked agents in the same family, 7 of them open source. The score out of 100 only applies to open-source projects; for proprietary services we show the published entry price. A dash marks information the documentation does not state.
| Agent | Model | Score | Stars or entry price | Self-hostable | Human approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenManus | open source | 66 | 58.8K ★ | yes | – |
| Langflow | open source | 93 | 156K ★ | yes | – |
| n8n | open source | 85 | 208.5K ★ | yes | – |
| Sim | open source | 85 | 29.9K ★ | yes | – |
| AutoGPT | open source | 84 | 187.7K ★ | yes | – |
| Dify | open source | 83 | 159.4K ★ | yes | – |
| Kestra | open source | 80 | 30K ★ | yes | – |
| Trigger.dev | open source | 77 | 16.6K ★ | yes | – |
How we rated it
Score: 66/100, computed only from public, verifiable data, with no subjective testing or partnership:
- Adoption 33/40: 58,764 stars on a log scale (40 points from about 200,000).
- Activity 13/30: last commit 2 months ago, 0 releases in six months, 10 commits in a year.
- Framework 20/30: licence, default human approval, self-hosting, model choice and documentation site.
The score does not say whether the agent will succeed at your tasks: it measures how solid the project is. The full grid is on the method page.
Verdict
OpenManus is a serious option; check the limitations below before granting it access.
Strengths
- Widely followed: 58.8K stars
- Can run on your side: data under control
- Free choice of model
- Permissive licence (MIT)
Limitations
- Broad access without default approval
Avoid if…
- You cannot isolate it (container, virtual machine)
Alternatives
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenManus free?
The software is free (MIT licence). You still pay for the model calls, unless you use a local model.
Is OpenManus safe?
Our risk level: high. Points found: sensitive access and outside content. Give it minimum rights and approve irreversible actions.
Which models does OpenManus use?
According to its documentation: GPT (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic), and any OpenAI-compatible model.
Can OpenManus be installed on your own server?
Yes, from the FoundationAgents/OpenManus repository. Data then stays with you, but security and updates are your job.
What are the alternatives to OpenManus?
In the same family: Langflow, n8n, Sim, and AutoGPT.
OpenManus or Langflow: what is the difference?
Both belong to the automation family. OpenManus has 58.8K stars against 156K for Langflow. The right choice mostly depends on the access you are willing to give it.
Related articles
- Open source or proprietary AI agent: how to decideOctober 25, 2026
- AI agent vs. chatbot: what's the difference?October 24, 2026
- Autonomous AI agents: how much should you let them do?October 12, 2026
- AI agent memory: how agents remember (and forget)October 11, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score