Voice agents · agent framework
Pipecat: review, pricing, security and alternatives
Pipecat is an open-source agent framework published by Daily, in the voice agents family. Pipecat provides a Python framework for assembling voice agents and multimodal applications that operate in real time. Its repository has 16,779 stars and its last commit is from October 24, 2026.
| Adoption (stars) | 27/40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Activity (commits, releases) | 30/30 | |
| Framework (licence, control, models) | 25/30 |
What Pipecat does
Pipecat belongs to the voice agents family: agents that listen and answer out loud, on the phone or in an app, in real time. On our grid it ranks #1 of the 3 projects of this family listed in the directory.
Unlike a ready-made agent, a framework provides the parts to build one: tool calling, step sequencing, memory, coordination of several agents. It is aimed at teams that want a custom agent.
You use it from: developer SDK. Usable models: GPT (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), Claude (Anthropic), local models (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM…), and any OpenAI-compatible model. It can run on your own machine or server.
Who is Pipecat for?
It targets companies that want an agent able to hold a spoken conversation, on the phone or in an app. Typical tasks people give it:
- answer simple calls and book appointments
- qualify a caller before transferring
- add a voice interface to an app
It is a good candidate if your data must stay on your machines and you want the option of a local model, with no API fees.
Access and human control
A framework has no access of its own: the tools you plug in define what the agent can do. Start with read-only tools.
We could not establish whether it asks for human approval before sensitive actions: test it first on an unimportant account or folder.
Pipecat pricing
The code is free, under the BSD-2-Clause licence.
Getting started with Pipecat
- Install it: the project ships as a Python package (install with
piporuv). The exact command is in the repository README. - Pick the model: an API key from a provider, or a local model if your machine has enough graphics memory (the VRAM calculator tells you).
- Start with the minimal example from the docs, then add one tool at a time and check what the agent does with it.
- Give it a short, checkable task, review the result and its action log, then raise the difficulty step by step.
Security: risk level
A voice agent records voices, which are sensitive personal data: inform callers and check where recordings are stored.
Three habits: least privilege (minimal rights, dedicated keys), human approval for irreversible actions, a sandbox for code execution. The AI agent security check reviews your setup in a few minutes.
Project activity and releases
Created on December 27, 2023, the pipecat-ai/pipecat repository has 16,779 stars, 2,957 forks and 118 open issues, with 14,422 commits in total. It received changes this month.
Over the last 52 weeks: 8,313 commits, an average of 159.9 per week.
124 releases in total; 30 in the last twelve months. Latest release: v1.14.0, on October 24, 2026.
Pipecat and other voice agents at a glance
The 2 best-ranked agents in the same family, 2 of them open source. The score out of 100 only applies to open-source projects; for proprietary services we show the published entry price. A dash marks information the documentation does not state.
| Agent | Model | Score | Stars or entry price | Self-hostable | Human approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pipecat | open source | 82 | 16.8K ★ | yes | – |
| LiveKit Agents | open source | 81 | 14.9K ★ | yes | – |
| Vision Agents | open source | 73 | 8.2K ★ | yes | – |
How we rated it
Score: 82/100, computed only from public, verifiable data, with no subjective testing or partnership:
- Adoption 27/40: 16,779 stars on a log scale (40 points from about 200,000).
- Activity 30/30: last commit less than a month ago, 16 releases in six months, 8,313 commits in a year.
- Framework 25/30: licence, default human approval, self-hosting, model choice and documentation site.
The score does not say whether the agent will succeed at your tasks: it measures how solid the project is. The full grid is on the method page.
Verdict
Pipecat is one of the most solid projects in its family: followed, active and well framed.
Strengths
- Very active development
- Frequent releases (30 in a year)
- Can run on your side: data under control
- Free choice of model
- Permissive licence (BSD-2-Clause)
Limitations
- Requires programming skills
Avoid if…
- You want a ready-made agent, without code
Alternatives
- LiveKit Agents14.9K ★
- Vision Agents8.2K ★
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
Is Pipecat free?
The software is free (BSD-2-Clause licence). You still pay for the model calls, unless you use a local model.
Is Pipecat safe?
Our risk level: low. Give it minimum rights and approve irreversible actions.
Which models does Pipecat use?
According to its documentation: GPT (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), Claude (Anthropic), local models (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM…), and any OpenAI-compatible model.
Can Pipecat be installed on your own server?
Yes, from the pipecat-ai/pipecat repository. Data then stays with you, but security and updates are your job.
What are the alternatives to Pipecat?
In the same family: LiveKit Agents and Vision Agents.
Pipecat or LiveKit Agents: what is the difference?
Both belong to the voice agents family. Pipecat has 16.8K stars against 14.9K for LiveKit Agents. The right choice mostly depends on the access you are willing to give it.
Related articles
- Open source or proprietary AI agent: how to decideOctober 25, 2026
- AI agent vs. chatbot: what's the difference?October 24, 2026
- Autonomous AI agents: how much should you let them do?October 12, 2026
- AI agent memory: how agents remember (and forget)October 11, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score