Data and RAG · agent platform
RAGapp: review, pricing, security and alternatives
RAGapp is an open-source agent platform published by ragapp, in the data and rag family. RAGapp lets users configure and deploy document-based RAG assistants through a web interface and Docker containers. Its repository has 4,442 stars and its last commit is from November 4, 2024.
| Adoption (stars) | 20/40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Activity (commits, releases) | 0/30 | |
| Framework (licence, control, models) | 20/30 |
What RAGapp does
RAGapp belongs to the data and rag family: agents that query databases and company documents to answer questions or produce analyses. On our grid it ranks #14 of the 15 projects of this family listed in the directory.
You use it from: web app and API. Usable models: GPT (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), and local models (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM…). It can run on your own machine or server.
Who is RAGapp for?
It is for teams that want an AI to answer from their own documents or databases. Typical tasks people give it:
- query internal documentation in plain language
- ask a database questions without SQL
- index and summarise large file collections
It is a good candidate if you prefer doing everything in a browser, with no install, your data must stay on your machines, and you want the option of a local model, with no API fees.
Access and human control
Its documentation does not detail the access granted to the agent: check the settings before connecting it to your accounts.
We could not establish whether it asks for human approval before sensitive actions: test it first on an unimportant account or folder.
RAGapp pricing
The code is free, under the Apache-2.0 licence.
Getting started with RAGapp
- Install it: the project ships as a Node.js package (install with
npm, or run directly withnpx). The exact command is in the repository README. - Pick the model: an API key from a provider, or a local model if your machine has enough graphics memory (the VRAM calculator tells you).
- Give it a first playground with nothing at stake: a test folder, a secondary account or a throwaway project. Only open your real accounts once you have seen how it behaves.
- Give it a short, checkable task, review the result and its action log, then raise the difficulty step by step.
Security: risk level
Give it read-only access and check generated queries before any data change.
Points found for RAGapp:
- Maintenance: no commit for 24 months, flaws are no longer fixed.
Three habits: least privilege (minimal rights, dedicated keys), human approval for irreversible actions, a sandbox for code execution. The AI agent security check reviews your setup in a few minutes.
Project activity and releases
Created on April 29, 2024, the ragapp/ragapp repository has 4,442 stars, 469 forks and 55 open issues, with 192 commits in total. Last change 24 months ago.
Over the last 52 weeks: 0 commits, an average of 0 per week.
21 releases in total; 0 in the last twelve months. Latest release: v0.1.5, on November 4, 2024.
RAGapp vs other data and rag
GitHub stars of the best-rated open-source projects in the data and rag family. Stars measure attention, not quality: a heavily promoted project collects them fast, a specialised tool will have few.
RAGapp and other data and rag at a glance
The 7 best-ranked agents in the same family, 7 of them open source. The score out of 100 only applies to open-source projects; for proprietary services we show the published entry price. A dash marks information the documentation does not state.
| Agent | Model | Score | Stars or entry price | Self-hostable | Human approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAGapp | open source | 40 | 4.4K ★ | yes | – |
| RAGFlow | open source | 91 | 92.8K ★ | yes | – |
| LlamaIndex | open source | 85 | 52.6K ★ | yes | – |
| MaxKB | open source | 83 | 23K ★ | yes | – |
| PageIndex | open source | 79 | 39.6K ★ | yes | – |
| txtai | open source | 78 | 13K ★ | yes | – |
| WeKnora | open source | 76 | 35.3K ★ | yes | – |
| Yuxi | open source | 69 | 7.5K ★ | yes | – |
How we rated it
Score: 40/100, computed only from public, verifiable data, with no subjective testing or partnership:
- Adoption 20/40: 4,442 stars on a log scale (40 points from about 200,000).
- Activity 0/30: last commit 24 months ago, 0 releases in six months, 0 commits in a year.
- Framework 20/30: licence, default human approval, self-hosting, model choice and documentation site.
The score does not say whether the agent will succeed at your tasks: it measures how solid the project is. The full grid is on the method page.
Verdict
RAGapp is a project to watch: compare it with the alternatives before adopting it.
Strengths
- Can run on your side: data under control
- Free choice of model
- Permissive licence (Apache-2.0)
Limitations
- No commit for 24 months
Avoid if…
- Production use without reviewing the code
Alternatives
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
Is RAGapp free?
The software is free (Apache-2.0 licence). You still pay for the model calls, unless you use a local model.
Is RAGapp safe?
Our risk level: mid. Points found: maintenance. Give it minimum rights and approve irreversible actions.
Which models does RAGapp use?
According to its documentation: GPT (OpenAI), Gemini (Google), and local models (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM…).
Can RAGapp be installed on your own server?
Yes, from the ragapp/ragapp repository. Data then stays with you, but security and updates are your job.
What are the alternatives to RAGapp?
In the same family: RAGFlow, LlamaIndex, MaxKB, and PageIndex.
RAGapp or RAGFlow: what is the difference?
Both belong to the data and rag family. RAGapp has 4.4K stars against 92.8K for RAGFlow. The right choice mostly depends on the access you are willing to give it.
Related articles
- Open source or proprietary AI agent: how to decideOctober 25, 2026
- AI agent vs. chatbot: what's the difference?October 24, 2026
- Autonomous AI agents: how much should you let them do?October 12, 2026
- AI agent memory: how agents remember (and forget)October 11, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score