Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Sol
Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-6 Sol (OpenAI) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Claude Opus 5 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Released | July 24, 2026 | September 22, 2026 |
| Capability index | 92.7 / 100 | 89.2 / 100 |
| Input price | $5 | $2 |
| Output price | $25 | $10 |
| Cost of a typical task | $0.15 | $0.06 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text, image, PDF | text, image, PDF |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Knowledge cutoff | May 2026 | April 20, 2026 |
What are we comparing?
This comparison pits two frontier models, the ones you pick when quality comes first against each other: Claude Opus 5 and GPT-6 Sol, one from Anthropic, the other from OpenAI. The first dates from July 24, 2026, the second from September 22, 2026.
All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.
What the benchmarks say
On our capability index, Claude Opus 5 scores 92.7 out of 100 and GPT-6 Sol 89.2. Claude Opus 5 leads by 3.5 points.
On the 5 benchmarks reported for both, Claude Opus 5 wins 2 times and GPT-6 Sol 3:
- GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): Claude Opus 5 93.9%, GPT-6 Sol 94.3%
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): Claude Opus 5 98.9%, GPT-6 Sol 100%
- FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): Claude Opus 5 85.6%, GPT-6 Sol 89.8%
- FrontierCode (advanced programming tasks): Claude Opus 5 53.4%, GPT-6 Sol 49.3%
- APEX-Agents (professional tasks carried out by an agent): Claude Opus 5 65.8%, GPT-6 Sol 54.3%
Pricing
Claude Opus 5 costs $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Sol costs $2 and $10.
For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.15 with Claude Opus 5 versus $0.06 with GPT-6 Sol. GPT-6 Sol is 2.5 times cheaper, a gap that adds up quickly over 1,000 tasks: $90 difference.
Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.
Features and limits
GPT-6 Sol reads more in one go: 1,050,000 tokens of context (roughly 1,575 pages), versus 1,000,000 for Claude Opus 5.
Reasoning mode: Claude Opus 5 yes, GPT-6 Sol yes. Tool calling: Claude Opus 5 yes, GPT-6 Sol yes. Image input: Claude Opus 5 yes, GPT-6 Sol yes.
Neither publishes its weights: both are used through an API.
Knowledge cutoff: May 2026 for Claude Opus 5, April 20, 2026 for GPT-6 Sol.
In short
Our reading of the data:
- Choose Claude Opus 5 for a higher capability index.
- Choose GPT-6 Sol for a lower cost and a more recent release.
This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 5 or GPT-6 Sol: which is better?
On our index (Epoch AI data), Claude Opus 5 scores 92.7 and GPT-6 Sol 89.2 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.
Which one is cheaper?
GPT-6 Sol. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.15 with Claude Opus 5 and $0.06 with GPT-6 Sol (prices as of October 22, 2026).
Which one has the larger context window?
GPT-6 Sol, with 1,050,000 tokens versus 1,000,000.
Can I run Claude Opus 5 or GPT-6 Sol on my own servers?
No: both are closed models, available through an API.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.