Claude Sonnet 5.5 versus GPT-6 Sol
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-6 Sol (OpenAI) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Released | September 28, 2026 | September 22, 2026 |
| Capability index | 95.9 / 100 | 89.2 / 100 |
| Input price | $2 | $2 |
| Output price | $10 | $10 |
| Cost of a typical task | $0.06 | $0.06 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text, image, PDF | text, image, PDF |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Knowledge cutoff | June 2026 | April 20, 2026 |
Two models head to head
This comparison pits two frontier models, the ones you pick when quality comes first against each other: Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol, one from Anthropic, the other from OpenAI. The first dates from September 28, 2026, the second from September 22, 2026.
All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.
Performance
On our capability index, Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 95.9 out of 100 and GPT-6 Sol 89.2. Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads by 6.7 points.
On the 5 benchmarks reported for both, Claude Sonnet 5.5 wins 3 times and GPT-6 Sol 1:
- GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): Claude Sonnet 5.5 95.6%, GPT-6 Sol 94.3%
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): Claude Sonnet 5.5 100%, GPT-6 Sol 100%
- FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): Claude Sonnet 5.5 88.8%, GPT-6 Sol 89.8%
- FrontierCode (advanced programming tasks): Claude Sonnet 5.5 52.1%, GPT-6 Sol 49.3%
- APEX-Agents (professional tasks carried out by an agent): Claude Sonnet 5.5 75.5%, GPT-6 Sol 54.3%
Pricing
Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Sol costs $2 and $10.
For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.06 with Claude Sonnet 5.5 versus $0.06 with GPT-6 Sol. The cost is almost the same.
Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.
Under the hood
GPT-6 Sol reads more in one go: 1,050,000 tokens of context (roughly 1,575 pages), versus 1,000,000 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
Reasoning mode: Claude Sonnet 5.5 yes, GPT-6 Sol yes. Tool calling: Claude Sonnet 5.5 yes, GPT-6 Sol yes. Image input: Claude Sonnet 5.5 yes, GPT-6 Sol yes.
Neither publishes its weights: both are used through an API.
Knowledge cutoff: June 2026 for Claude Sonnet 5.5, April 20, 2026 for GPT-6 Sol.
In short
Our reading of the data:
- Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for a higher capability index.
This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6 Sol: which is better?
On our index (Epoch AI data), Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 95.9 and GPT-6 Sol 89.2 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.
Which one is cheaper?
Claude Sonnet 5.5. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.06 with Claude Sonnet 5.5 and $0.06 with GPT-6 Sol (prices as of October 22, 2026).
Which one has the larger context window?
GPT-6 Sol, with 1,050,000 tokens versus 1,000,000.
Can I run Claude Sonnet 5.5 or GPT-6 Sol on my own servers?
No: both are closed models, available through an API.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.