Gemini 4 Argon versus GPT-6 Astra
Gemini 4 Argon (Google DeepMind) and GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | OpenAI |
| Released | October 13, 2026 | September 4, 2026 |
| Capability index | 95.3 / 100 | 94.7 / 100 |
| Input price | $2 | $10 |
| Output price | $10 | $50 |
| Cost of a typical task | $0.06 | $0.30 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 32,768 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text, image, video, audio, PDF | text, image, PDF |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Knowledge cutoff | March 2026 | April 30, 2026 |
The match-up at a glance
Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-6 Astra are two frontier models, the ones you pick when quality comes first, one from Google DeepMind, the other from OpenAI. Gemini 4 Argon was released on October 13, 2026, GPT-6 Astra on September 4, 2026.
All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.
Performance
On our capability index, Gemini 4 Argon scores 95.3 out of 100 and GPT-6 Astra 94.7. The gap is too small to separate them.
On the 5 benchmarks reported for both, Gemini 4 Argon wins 2 times and GPT-6 Astra 2:
- GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): Gemini 4 Argon 96.4%, GPT-6 Astra 95.8%
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): Gemini 4 Argon 100%, GPT-6 Astra 100%
- FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): Gemini 4 Argon 86%, GPT-6 Astra 93.7%
- FrontierCode (advanced programming tasks): Gemini 4 Argon 47.6%, GPT-6 Astra 53.3%
- APEX-Agents (professional tasks carried out by an agent): Gemini 4 Argon 82.4%, GPT-6 Astra 64.7%
Budget
Gemini 4 Argon costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Astra costs $10 and $50.
For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.06 with Gemini 4 Argon versus $0.30 with GPT-6 Astra. Gemini 4 Argon is 5 times cheaper, a gap that adds up quickly over 1,000 tasks: $240 difference.
Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.
Context and capabilities
GPT-6 Astra reads more in one go: 1,050,000 tokens of context (roughly 1,575 pages), versus 1,048,576 for Gemini 4 Argon.
Reasoning mode: Gemini 4 Argon yes, GPT-6 Astra yes. Tool calling: Gemini 4 Argon yes, GPT-6 Astra yes. Image input: Gemini 4 Argon yes, GPT-6 Astra yes.
Neither publishes its weights: both are used through an API.
Knowledge cutoff: March 2026 for Gemini 4 Argon, April 30, 2026 for GPT-6 Astra.
In short
Our reading of the data:
- Choose Gemini 4 Argon for a lower cost.
This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-6 Astra: which is better?
On our index (Epoch AI data), Gemini 4 Argon scores 95.3 and GPT-6 Astra 94.7 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.
Which one is cheaper?
Gemini 4 Argon. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.06 with Gemini 4 Argon and $0.30 with GPT-6 Astra (prices as of October 22, 2026).
Which one has the larger context window?
GPT-6 Astra, with 1,050,000 tokens versus 1,048,576.
Can I run Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-6 Astra on my own servers?
No: both are closed models, available through an API.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.