GLM-5 or GLM-5.3: which to choose?
GLM-5 (Zhipu AI (Z.ai)) and GLM-5.3 (Zhipu AI (Z.ai)) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | GLM-5 | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Zhipu AI (Z.ai) | Zhipu AI (Z.ai) |
| Released | February 12, 2026 | August 14, 2026 |
| Capability index | 77.2 / 100 | 78.8 / 100 |
| Input price | $0.60 | $1.2 |
| Output price | $2.69 | $4.18 |
| Cost of a typical task | $0.017 | $0.032 |
| Context window | 204,800 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text | text |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Knowledge cutoff | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
What are we comparing?
GLM-5 and GLM-5.3 are two open-weight models that you can install on your own servers, both built by Zhipu AI (Z.ai). GLM-5 was released on February 12, 2026, GLM-5.3 on August 14, 2026.
All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.
Performance
On our capability index, GLM-5 scores 77.2 out of 100 and GLM-5.3 78.8. GLM-5.3 leads by 1.6 points.
On the 2 benchmarks reported for both, GLM-5 wins 0 times and GLM-5.3 2:
- GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): GLM-5 87.8%, GLM-5.3 90.9%
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): GLM-5 80%, GLM-5.3 91.1%
Budget
GLM-5 costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.69 per million output tokens; GLM-5.3 costs $1.2 and $4.18.
For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.017 with GLM-5 versus $0.032 with GLM-5.3. GLM-5 is 1.9 times cheaper, a gap that adds up quickly over 1,000 tasks: $14.94 difference.
Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.
Features and limits
GLM-5.3 reads more in one go: 1,000,000 tokens of context (roughly 1,500 pages), versus 204,800 for GLM-5.
Reasoning mode: GLM-5 yes, GLM-5.3 yes. Tool calling: GLM-5 yes, GLM-5.3 yes. Image input: GLM-5 no, GLM-5.3 no.
Both publish their weights: you can host them yourself.
In short
Our reading of the data:
- Choose GLM-5 for a lower cost.
- Choose GLM-5.3 for a higher capability index, a larger context window and a more recent release.
This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
GLM-5 or GLM-5.3: which is better?
On our index (Epoch AI data), GLM-5 scores 77.2 and GLM-5.3 78.8 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.
Which one is cheaper?
GLM-5. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.017 with GLM-5 and $0.032 with GLM-5.3 (prices as of October 22, 2026).
Which one has the larger context window?
GLM-5.3, with 1,000,000 tokens versus 204,800.
Can I run GLM-5 or GLM-5.3 on my own servers?
Yes, both publish their weights. Check each license before commercial use.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.