Grok 4.6 versus Kimi K2.6
Grok 4.6 (xAI) and Kimi K2.6 (Moonshot AI) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Grok 4.6 | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | xAI | Moonshot AI |
| Released | August 12, 2026 | April 20, 2026 |
| Capability index | 86.1 / 100 | 84.4 / 100 |
| Input price | $2 | $0.95 |
| Output price | $6 | $4 |
| Cost of a typical task | $0.052 | $0.027 |
| Context window | 500,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Maximum output | 500,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text, image, PDF | text, image, video |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| Knowledge cutoff | February 1, 2026 | January 2025 |
What are we comparing?
Grok 4.6 and Kimi K2.6 are the flagship models of two major developers, one from xAI, the other from Moonshot AI. Grok 4.6 was released on August 12, 2026, Kimi K2.6 on April 20, 2026.
All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.
Performance
On our capability index, Grok 4.6 scores 86.1 out of 100 and Kimi K2.6 84.4. Grok 4.6 leads by 1.7 points.
On the 3 benchmarks reported for both, Grok 4.6 wins 3 times and Kimi K2.6 0:
- GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): Grok 4.6 94%, Kimi K2.6 90.8%
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): Grok 4.6 99.2%, Kimi K2.6 96.1%
- FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): Grok 4.6 66%, Kimi K2.6 57.2%
Pricing
Grok 4.6 costs $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95 and $4.
For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.052 with Grok 4.6 versus $0.027 with Kimi K2.6. Kimi K2.6 is 1.9 times cheaper, a gap that adds up quickly over 1,000 tasks: $25 difference.
Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.
Features and limits
Grok 4.6 reads more in one go: 500,000 tokens of context (roughly 750 pages), versus 262,144 for Kimi K2.6.
Reasoning mode: Grok 4.6 yes, Kimi K2.6 yes. Tool calling: Grok 4.6 yes, Kimi K2.6 yes. Image input: Grok 4.6 yes, Kimi K2.6 yes.
Kimi K2.6 publishes its weights and can run on your servers; Grok 4.6 is a closed model, available only through an API.
Knowledge cutoff: February 1, 2026 for Grok 4.6, January 2025 for Kimi K2.6.
In short
Our reading of the data:
- Choose Grok 4.6 for a higher capability index, a larger context window and a more recent release.
- Choose Kimi K2.6 for a lower cost and open weights (you can host it yourself).
This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Grok 4.6 or Kimi K2.6: which is better?
On our index (Epoch AI data), Grok 4.6 scores 86.1 and Kimi K2.6 84.4 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.
Which one is cheaper?
Kimi K2.6. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.052 with Grok 4.6 and $0.027 with Kimi K2.6 (prices as of October 22, 2026).
Which one has the larger context window?
Grok 4.6, with 500,000 tokens versus 262,144.
Can I run Grok 4.6 or Kimi K2.6 on my own servers?
Only Kimi K2.6, whose weights are published. Grok 4.6 is used through an API.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.