Deep research · AI agent
DeerFlow: review, pricing, security and alternatives
DeerFlow is an open-source AI agent published by ByteDance, in the deep research family. Handles research, coding, and creation tasks using tools, subagents, memory, skills, and sandboxed execution. Its repository has 84,377 stars and its last commit is from October 24, 2026.
| Adoption (stars) | 35/40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Activity (commits, releases) | 27/30 | |
| Framework (licence, control, models) | 25/30 |
What DeerFlow does
DeerFlow belongs to the deep research family: agents that search, read and cross-check dozens of sources to produce a sourced report. On our grid it ranks #1 of the 18 projects of this family listed in the directory.
You use it from: web app and API. Usable models: any OpenAI-compatible model. It can run on your own machine or server.
Who is DeerFlow for?
It targets analysts, students and teams who must cross-check many sources to produce a reasoned summary. Typical tasks people give it:
- write a sourced overview of a topic
- compare products or competitors
- prepare a technical or regulatory watch
It is a good candidate if you prefer doing everything in a browser, with no install and your data must stay on your machines.
Access and human control
According to its documentation, DeerFlow can:
- run commands in a terminal
- read and edit files
- drive a web browser
- call online services and APIs
We could not establish whether it asks for human approval before sensitive actions: test it first on an unimportant account or folder.
DeerFlow pricing
The code is free, under the MIT licence.
Getting started with DeerFlow
- Install it: the project ships as a Python package (install with
piporuv). The exact command is in the repository README. - Create an API key with the model provider and put it in an environment variable, never in a shared or versioned file.
- Give it a first playground with nothing at stake: a test folder, a secondary account or a throwaway project. Only open your real accounts once you have seen how it behaves.
- Give it a short, checkable task, review the result and its action log, then raise the difficulty step by step.
Security: risk level
An agent's report may cite misread or invented sources: check the links before reusing a figure.
Points found for DeerFlow:
- Sensitive access: it can run commands in a terminal, with no established default human approval.
- Outside content: it reads web pages or API responses, which may contain booby-trapped instructions (prompt injection).
Three habits: least privilege (minimal rights, dedicated keys), human approval for irreversible actions, a sandbox for code execution. The AI agent security check reviews your setup in a few minutes.
Project activity and releases
Created on May 7, 2025, the bytedance/deer-flow repository has 84,377 stars, 11,803 forks and 538 open issues, with 4,439 commits in total. It received changes this month.
Over the last 52 weeks: 3,874 commits, an average of 74.5 per week.
2 releases in total; 2 in the last twelve months. Latest release: v2.1.0, on September 24, 2026.
DeerFlow vs other deep research
GitHub stars of the best-rated open-source projects in the deep research family. Stars measure attention, not quality: a heavily promoted project collects them fast, a specialised tool will have few.
DeerFlow and other deep research at a glance
The 7 best-ranked agents in the same family, 7 of them open source. The score out of 100 only applies to open-source projects; for proprietary services we show the published entry price. A dash marks information the documentation does not state.
| Agent | Model | Score | Stars or entry price | Self-hostable | Human approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeerFlow | open source | 87 | 84.4K ★ | yes | – |
| GPT Researcher | open source | 80 | 30.3K ★ | yes | – |
| Open Science | open source | 76 | 5.4K ★ | yes | – |
| Feynman | open source | 74 | 10K ★ | yes | – |
| Local Deep Research | open source | 74 | 9.4K ★ | yes | – |
| OpenScience | open source | 70 | 4.2K ★ | yes | – |
| LLM for Zotero | open source | 68 | 3.4K ★ | yes | – |
| EvoScientist | open source | 65 | 4.9K ★ | – | – |
How we rated it
Score: 87/100, computed only from public, verifiable data, with no subjective testing or partnership:
- Adoption 35/40: 84,377 stars on a log scale (40 points from about 200,000).
- Activity 27/30: last commit less than a month ago, 2 releases in six months, 3,874 commits in a year.
- Framework 25/30: licence, default human approval, self-hosting, model choice and documentation site.
The score does not say whether the agent will succeed at your tasks: it measures how solid the project is. The full grid is on the method page.
Verdict
DeerFlow is one of the most solid projects in its family: followed, active and well framed.
Strengths
- Widely followed: 84.4K stars
- Very active development
- Can run on your side: data under control
- Free choice of model
- Permissive licence (MIT)
Limitations
- Broad access without default approval
Avoid if…
- You cannot isolate it (container, virtual machine)
Alternatives
- GPT Researcher30.3K ★
- Open Science5.4K ★
- Feynman10K ★
- Local Deep Research9.4K ★
- OpenScience4.2K ★
- LLM for Zotero3.4K ★
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
Is DeerFlow free?
The software is free (MIT licence). You still pay for the model calls, unless you use a local model.
Is DeerFlow safe?
Our risk level: high. Points found: sensitive access and outside content. Give it minimum rights and approve irreversible actions.
Which models does DeerFlow use?
According to its documentation: any OpenAI-compatible model.
Can DeerFlow be installed on your own server?
Yes, from the bytedance/deer-flow repository. Data then stays with you, but security and updates are your job.
What are the alternatives to DeerFlow?
In the same family: GPT Researcher, Open Science, Feynman, and Local Deep Research.
DeerFlow or GPT Researcher: what is the difference?
Both belong to the deep research family. DeerFlow has 84.4K stars against 30.3K for GPT Researcher. The right choice mostly depends on the access you are willing to give it.
Related articles
- Open source or proprietary AI agent: how to decideOctober 25, 2026
- AI agent vs. chatbot: what's the difference?October 24, 2026
- Autonomous AI agents: how much should you let them do?October 12, 2026
- AI agent memory: how agents remember (and forget)October 11, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score