Deep research · AI agent
Local Deep Research: review, pricing, security and alternatives
Local Deep Research is an open-source AI agent published by LearningCircuit, in the deep research family. Local Deep Research investigates web sources, scientific databases, and private documents using local or cloud language models. Its repository has 9,402 stars and its last commit is from October 24, 2026.
What Local Deep Research does
Local Deep Research belongs to the deep research family: agents that search, read and cross-check dozens of sources to produce a sourced report. On our grid it ranks #5 of the 18 projects of this family listed in the directory.
You use it from: web app, terminal (CLI), and API. Usable models: local models (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM…), Gemini (Google), Qwen (Alibaba), Mistral, and any OpenAI-compatible model. It can run on your own machine or server.
Who is Local Deep Research for?
It targets analysts, students and teams who must cross-check many sources to produce a reasoned summary. Typical tasks people give it:
- write a sourced overview of a topic
- compare products or competitors
- prepare a technical or regulatory watch
It is a good candidate if you are comfortable in a terminal, your data must stay on your machines, and you want the option of a local model, with no API fees.
Access and human control
According to its documentation, Local Deep Research can:
- call online services and APIs
- read and edit files
We could not establish whether it asks for human approval before sensitive actions: test it first on an unimportant account or folder.
Local Deep Research pricing
The code is free, under the MIT licence.
Getting started with Local Deep Research
- Install it: the project ships as a Python package (install with
piporuv). The exact command is in the repository README. - Pick the model: an API key from a provider, or a local model if your machine has enough graphics memory (the VRAM calculator tells you).
- Give it a first playground with nothing at stake: a test folder, a secondary account or a throwaway project. Only open your real accounts once you have seen how it behaves.
- Give it a short, checkable task, review the result and its action log, then raise the difficulty step by step.
Security: risk level
An agent's report may cite misread or invented sources: check the links before reusing a figure.
Points found for Local Deep Research:
- Outside content: it reads web pages or API responses, which may contain booby-trapped instructions (prompt injection).
Three habits: least privilege (minimal rights, dedicated keys), human approval for irreversible actions, a sandbox for code execution. The AI agent security check reviews your setup in a few minutes.
Project activity and releases
Created on February 9, 2025, the LearningCircuit/local-deep-research repository has 9,402 stars, 883 forks and 991 open issues, with 8,480 commits in total. It received changes this month.
Over the last 52 weeks: 4,986 commits, an average of 95.9 per week.
172 releases in total; 30 in the last twelve months. Latest release: v1.10.7, on August 28, 2026.
Local Deep Research vs other deep research
GitHub stars of the best-rated open-source projects in the deep research family. Stars measure attention, not quality: a heavily promoted project collects them fast, a specialised tool will have few.
Local Deep Research and other deep research at a glance
The 7 best-ranked agents in the same family, 7 of them open source. The score out of 100 only applies to open-source projects; for proprietary services we show the published entry price. A dash marks information the documentation does not state.
| Agent | Model | Score | Stars or entry price | Self-hostable | Human approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local Deep Research | open source | 74 | 9.4K ★ | yes | – |
| DeerFlow | open source | 87 | 84.4K ★ | yes | – |
| GPT Researcher | open source | 80 | 30.3K ★ | yes | – |
| Open Science | open source | 76 | 5.4K ★ | yes | – |
| Feynman | open source | 74 | 10K ★ | yes | – |
| OpenScience | open source | 70 | 4.2K ★ | yes | – |
| LLM for Zotero | open source | 68 | 3.4K ★ | yes | – |
| EvoScientist | open source | 65 | 4.9K ★ | – | – |
How we rated it
Score: 74/100, computed only from public, verifiable data, with no subjective testing or partnership:
- Adoption 24/40: 9,402 stars on a log scale (40 points from about 200,000).
- Activity 30/30: last commit less than a month ago, 27 releases in six months, 4,986 commits in a year.
- Framework 20/30: licence, default human approval, self-hosting, model choice and documentation site.
The score does not say whether the agent will succeed at your tasks: it measures how solid the project is. The full grid is on the method page.
Verdict
Local Deep Research is a serious option; check the limitations below before granting it access.
Strengths
- Very active development
- Frequent releases (30 in a year)
- Can run on your side: data under control
- Free choice of model
- Permissive licence (MIT)
Alternatives
- DeerFlow84.4K ★
- GPT Researcher30.3K ★
- Open Science5.4K ★
- Feynman10K ★
- OpenScience4.2K ★
- LLM for Zotero3.4K ★
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
Is Local Deep Research free?
The software is free (MIT licence). You still pay for the model calls, unless you use a local model.
Is Local Deep Research safe?
Our risk level: mid. Points found: outside content. Give it minimum rights and approve irreversible actions.
Which models does Local Deep Research use?
According to its documentation: local models (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM…), Gemini (Google), Qwen (Alibaba), Mistral, and any OpenAI-compatible model.
Can Local Deep Research be installed on your own server?
Yes, from the LearningCircuit/local-deep-research repository. Data then stays with you, but security and updates are your job.
What are the alternatives to Local Deep Research?
In the same family: DeerFlow, GPT Researcher, Open Science, and Feynman.
Local Deep Research or DeerFlow: what is the difference?
Both belong to the deep research family. Local Deep Research has 9.4K stars against 84.4K for DeerFlow. The right choice mostly depends on the access you are willing to give it.
Related articles
- Open source or proprietary AI agent: how to decideOctober 25, 2026
- AI agent vs. chatbot: what's the difference?October 24, 2026
- Autonomous AI agents: how much should you let them do?October 12, 2026
- AI agent memory: how agents remember (and forget)October 11, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score