FRENES

Multi-agent · agent platform

Edict: review, pricing, security and alternatives

Edict is an open-source agent platform published by cft0808, in the multi-agent family. Edict orchestrates nine specialized OpenClaw agents with a dashboard, model configuration, and execution audit trails. Its repository has 17,014 stars and its last commit is from May 6, 2026.

Open sourceSelf-hostableLast commit 6 months agoLow risk

What Edict does

Edict belongs to the multi-agent family: systems that split a task between several specialised agents passing work to one another. On our grid it ranks #37 of the 43 projects of this family listed in the directory.

You use it from: web app. Usable models: Claude (Anthropic) and GPT (OpenAI). It can run on your own machine or server.

Who is Edict for?

It interests technical teams that want to split a complex task between several specialised agents that check each other. Typical tasks people give it:

  • pair a writer agent with a reviewer agent
  • split a project into subtasks given to roles
  • simulate a team (analysis, plan, execution)

It is a good candidate if you prefer doing everything in a browser, with no install and your data must stay on your machines.

Access and human control

Its documentation does not detail the access granted to the agent: check the settings before connecting it to your accounts.

We could not establish whether it asks for human approval before sensitive actions: test it first on an unimportant account or folder.

Run commands in a terminalRun commands in a terminal : 5 %5 %Read and edit filesRead and edit files : 7 %7 %Drive a web browserDrive a web browser : 7 %7 %Call online services and APIsCall online services and APIs : 9 %9 %Read and send messagesRead and send messages : 5 %5 %
Share of the 43 agents in the family that have each access, according to their documentation. In orange, Edict's access.

Edict pricing

The code is free, under the MIT licence.

Getting started with Edict

  1. Install it: the project ships as a Python package (install with pip or uv). The exact command is in the repository README.
  2. Create an API key with the model provider and put it in an environment variable, never in a shared or versioned file.
  3. Give it a first playground with nothing at stake: a test folder, a secondary account or a throwaway project. Only open your real accounts once you have seen how it behaves.
  4. Give it a short, checkable task, review the result and its action log, then raise the difficulty step by step.

Security: risk level

More agents mean higher bills and chained errors: set a budget and a maximum number of steps.

Three habits: least privilege (minimal rights, dedicated keys), human approval for irreversible actions, a sandbox for code execution. The AI agent security check reviews your setup in a few minutes.

Project activity and releases

Created on February 23, 2026, the cft0808/edict repository has 17,014 stars, 1,767 forks and 10 open issues, with 149 commits in total. Last change 6 months ago.

Over the last 52 weeks: 140 commits, an average of 2.7 per week.

Nov 2, : 0 · Nov 2, 2025Nov 2,Nov 9, : 0 · Nov 9, 2025Nov 16, : 0 · Nov 16, 2025Nov 23, : 0 · Nov 23, 2025Nov 30, : 0 · Nov 30, 2025Dec 7, : 0 · Dec 7, 2025Dec 14, : 0 · Dec 14, 2025Dec 21, : 0 · Dec 21, 2025Dec 28, : 0 · Dec 28, 2025Dec 28,Jan 4, : 0 · Jan 4, 2026Jan 11, : 0 · Jan 11, 2026Jan 18, : 0 · Jan 18, 2026Jan 25, : 0 · Jan 25, 2026Feb 1, : 0 · Feb 1, 2026Feb 8, : 0 · Feb 8, 2026Feb 15, : 0 · Feb 15, 2026Feb 22, : 0 · Feb 22, 2026Feb 22,Mar 1, : 56 · Mar 1, 2026Mar 8, : 16 · Mar 8, 2026Mar 15, : 1 · Mar 15, 2026Mar 22, : 3 · Mar 22, 2026Mar 29, : 30 · Mar 29, 2026Apr 5, : 5 · Apr 5, 2026Apr 12, : 6 · Apr 12, 2026Apr 19, : 2 · Apr 19, 2026Apr 19,Apr 26, : 14 · Apr 26, 2026May 3, : 3 · May 3, 2026May 10, : 4 · May 10, 2026May 17, : 0 · May 17, 2026May 24, : 0 · May 24, 2026May 31, : 0 · May 31, 2026Jun 7, : 0 · Jun 7, 2026Jun 14, : 0 · Jun 14, 2026Jun 14,Jun 21, : 0 · Jun 21, 2026Jun 28, : 0 · Jun 28, 2026Jul 5, : 0 · Jul 5, 2026Jul 12, : 0 · Jul 12, 2026Jul 19, : 0 · Jul 19, 2026Jul 26, : 0 · Jul 26, 2026Aug 2, : 0 · Aug 2, 2026Aug 9, : 0 · Aug 9, 2026Aug 9,Aug 16, : 0 · Aug 16, 2026Aug 23, : 0 · Aug 23, 2026Aug 30, : 0 · Aug 30, 2026Sep 6, : 0 · Sep 6, 2026Sep 13, : 0 · Sep 13, 2026Sep 20, : 0 · Sep 20, 2026Sep 27, : 0 · Sep 27, 2026Oct 4, : 0 · Oct 4, 2026Oct 4,Oct 11, : 0 · Oct 11, 2026Oct 18, : 0 · Oct 18, 2026Oct 25, : 0 · Oct 25, 2026Oct 25,
Commits per week on the main repository, last 52 weeks (GitHub API, checked October 25, 2026).

The project publishes no numbered releases on GitHub: you install it from the main branch or a package manager.

Edict vs other multi-agent

GitHub stars of the best-rated open-source projects in the multi-agent family. Stars measure attention, not quality: a heavily promoted project collects them fast, a specialised tool will have few.

OrcaOrca : 104.7K104.7KCrewAICrewAI : 60.1K60.1KAgnoAgno : 42.9K42.9KPaperclipPaperclip : 106.8K106.8KAgentScopeAgentScope : 33.8K33.8KOpenAI Agents SDKOpenAI Agents SDK : 30.3K30.3KEigentEigent : 15.7K15.7KMicrosoft Agent FrameworkMicrosoft Agent Framework : 14.3K14.3KEdictEdict : 17K17K
Log scale; Edict in orange. Checked October 25, 2026.

Edict and other multi-agent at a glance

The 7 best-ranked agents in the same family, 7 of them open source. The score out of 100 only applies to open-source projects; for proprietary services we show the published entry price. A dash marks information the documentation does not state.

Quick comparison: multi-agent
AgentModelScoreStars or entry priceSelf-hostableHuman approval
Edictopen source5817K ★yes–
Orcaopen source91104.7K ★yes–
CrewAIopen source8860.1K ★yes–
Agnoopen source8742.9K ★yes–
Paperclipopen source86106.8K ★yes–
AgentScopeopen source8533.8K ★yes–
OpenAI Agents SDKopen source8530.3K ★yes–
Eigentopen source8115.7K ★yes–

How we rated it

Score: 58/100, computed only from public, verifiable data, with no subjective testing or partnership:

  • Adoption 27/40: 17,014 stars on a log scale (40 points from about 200,000).
  • Activity 11/30: last commit 6 months ago, 0 releases in six months, 140 commits in a year.
  • Framework 20/30: licence, default human approval, self-hosting, model choice and documentation site.

The score does not say whether the agent will succeed at your tasks: it measures how solid the project is. The full grid is on the method page.

Verdict

Edict is a project to watch: compare it with the alternatives before adopting it.

Strengths

  • Can run on your side: data under control
  • Permissive licence (MIT)

Frequently asked questions

Is Edict free?

The software is free (MIT licence). You still pay for the model calls, unless you use a local model.

Is Edict safe?

Our risk level: low. Give it minimum rights and approve irreversible actions.

Which models does Edict use?

According to its documentation: Claude (Anthropic) and GPT (OpenAI).

Can Edict be installed on your own server?

Yes, from the cft0808/edict repository. Data then stays with you, but security and updates are your job.

What are the alternatives to Edict?

In the same family: Orca, CrewAI, Agno, and Paperclip.

Edict or Orca: what is the difference?

Both belong to the multi-agent family. Edict has 17K stars against 104.7K for Orca. The right choice mostly depends on the access you are willing to give it.

Related articles

Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score