Gemini 4 Argon or Muse Spark 1.3: which to choose?
Gemini 4 Argon (Google DeepMind) and Muse Spark 1.3 (Meta) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Gemini 4 Argon | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Meta |
| Released | October 13, 2026 | September 2, 2026 |
| Capability index | 95.3 / 100 | 82.7 / 100 |
| Input price | $2 | $0.10 |
| Output price | $10 | $0.20 |
| Cost of a typical task | $0.06 | $0.002 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Maximum output | 32,768 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text, image, video, audio, PDF | text, image, video, PDF, audio |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Knowledge cutoff | March 2026 | Not disclosed |
The match-up at a glance
Gemini 4 Argon and Muse Spark 1.3 are the flagship models of two major developers, one from Google DeepMind, the other from Meta. Gemini 4 Argon was released on October 13, 2026, Muse Spark 1.3 on September 2, 2026.
All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.
What the benchmarks say
On our capability index, Gemini 4 Argon scores 95.3 out of 100 and Muse Spark 1.3 82.7. Gemini 4 Argon leads by 12.6 points.
On the 3 benchmarks reported for both, Gemini 4 Argon wins 3 times and Muse Spark 1.3 0:
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): Gemini 4 Argon 100%, Muse Spark 1.3 99.2%
- FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): Gemini 4 Argon 86%, Muse Spark 1.3 74.4%
- APEX-Agents (professional tasks carried out by an agent): Gemini 4 Argon 82.4%, Muse Spark 1.3 58.6%
Pricing
Gemini 4 Argon costs $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 costs $0.10 and $0.20.
For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.06 with Gemini 4 Argon versus $0.002 with Muse Spark 1.3. Muse Spark 1.3 is 25 times cheaper, a gap that adds up quickly over 1,000 tasks: $57.6 difference.
Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.
Features and limits
Both models have the same context window: 1,048,576 tokens, roughly 1,573 pages.
Reasoning mode: Gemini 4 Argon yes, Muse Spark 1.3 yes. Tool calling: Gemini 4 Argon yes, Muse Spark 1.3 yes. Image input: Gemini 4 Argon yes, Muse Spark 1.3 yes.
Neither publishes its weights: both are used through an API.
In short
Our reading of the data:
- Choose Gemini 4 Argon for a higher capability index.
- Choose Muse Spark 1.3 for a lower cost.
This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Gemini 4 Argon or Muse Spark 1.3: which is better?
On our index (Epoch AI data), Gemini 4 Argon scores 95.3 and Muse Spark 1.3 82.7 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.
Which one is cheaper?
Muse Spark 1.3. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.06 with Gemini 4 Argon and $0.002 with Muse Spark 1.3 (prices as of October 22, 2026).
Which one has the larger context window?
Neither: both accept 1,048,576 tokens.
Can I run Gemini 4 Argon or Muse Spark 1.3 on my own servers?
No: both are closed models, available through an API.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.