FRENES

Browser automation · MCP server

Stealthy Auto Browse: MCP server, setup and security

Stealthy Auto Browse is an open-source MCP server that lets an AI agent automate browsers using human-like input at the operating system level. Its repository has 94 stars and its last commit is from October 22, 2026 and it is licensed under WTFPL.

Actively maintainedSystem access

What Stealthy Auto Browse does

According to its repository: “Self-hosted MCP server for stealth browser automation with human-like OS-level input.”

An MCP server gives an AI agent extra tools it calls during the conversation: the agent reads their description, decides to use them and gets the result back. Stealthy Auto Browse is listed under Browser automation, a category of 109 servers in the directory, where it ranks #56 by stars.

Topics declared by the repository: automated, automation, browser, camoufox, container, docker.

Installing and connecting Stealthy Auto Browse

Distribution modes declared in the official MCP registry:

  • Docker (OCI) image

Like any MCP server, you declare it in your client's configuration (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, Codex…): a name, the command that starts it or its URL, and any environment variables. The client then starts it and lists its tools. Project language: Python.

Security: what to check

An MCP server runs code with the rights you give it, and the model reads its tool descriptions: a malicious or compromised server can hijack the agent. Read the code, or pick a maintained and widely used server, before connecting it.

Points found for Stealthy Auto Browse:

  • System access: the Browser automation category gives the agent control over files, a terminal, code or a browser. A booby-trapped instruction in content the agent reads (prompt injection) can then turn into an action.

Good practice: grant only the rights needed (least privilege), require human approval for irreversible actions, and run the AI agent security check.

Project activity and maintenance

Created on January 7, 2026, the psyb0t/docker-stealthy-auto-browse repository has 94 stars and 16 forks, with 0 open issues. It has more stars than 66% of the servers in the directory. It received changes this month. Version published in the registry: 3.2.0 (October 22, 2026).

Stars measure attention, not quality: a recent, heavily promoted project can collect them fast, while a useful but niche server will have few.

Browser useBrowser use : 119K119KScrapling MCP ServerScrapling MCP Server : 89.4K89.4KChrome DevTools MCPChrome DevTools MCP : 54.1K54.1KMCP server browserMCP server browser : 39.4K39.4KPlaywright MCPPlaywright MCP : 38.6K38.6KBrowserBrowser : 36.9K36.9KSkyvernSkyvern : 23.3K23.3KSeleniumBase MCPSeleniumBase MCP : 13.1K13.1KStealthy Auto BrowseStealthy Auto Browse : 9494
GitHub stars of the most followed servers in the category (log scale); Stealthy Auto Browse in orange. Checked October 25, 2026.

Verdict

Stealthy Auto Browse is a reasonable choice; check the points below before connecting it.

Strengths

  • Active project: recent commit
  • Listed in the official MCP registry

Avoid if…

  • You cannot isolate the agent (sandbox, container)

Frequently asked questions

How do I install Stealthy Auto Browse?

Stealthy Auto Browse is distributed as Docker (OCI) image. Add it to your client's MCP configuration (Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code…) following the README of psyb0t/docker-stealthy-auto-browse.

Is Stealthy Auto Browse free?

The code is published under the WTFPL licence and can be used free of charge.

Is Stealthy Auto Browse safe?

Points to watch: system access. Give it minimum rights and approve sensitive actions.

Is it an official server?

Nothing says so: it is a project published by psyb0t on GitHub. Check who maintains it before giving it access.

What are the alternatives to Stealthy Auto Browse?

In the same category: Firecrawl MCP Server, Browser use, MCP server browser, and Playwright MCP. Firecrawl MCP Server and Browser use score higher on our grid.

Related articles

Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score