Browser automation · MCP server
FSB: MCP server, setup and security
FSB is an open-source MCP server published on GitHub that lets an AI agent control your signed-in Chrome browser by reading the live DOM. Its repository has 203 stars and its last commit is from October 24, 2026 and it is licensed under MIT.
| Adoption (stars) | 23/40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Maintenance | 30/30 | |
| Framework (licence, registry, official) | 15/30 |
What FSB does
According to its repository: “Chrome extension plus MCP server that lets any MCP client drive your own signed in Chrome by reading the live DOM instead of screenshots, with no API key. 69 tools, session replay, and an encrypted credential vault.”
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is a standard plug between an AI agent and an outside service: once the server is connected, its tools show up in the agent, which decides when to call them. FSB is listed under Browser automation, a category of 109 servers in the directory, where it ranks #42 by stars.
Topics declared by the repository: browser-agent, chrome-extension, manifest-v3, full-self-browsing, agents, automation.
Installing and connecting FSB
No package or remote server is declared in the official MCP registry: you install it from source, following the repository README.
It works with any MCP-compatible client (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and most recent agents). You add one entry to the client's MCP configuration: server name, start command or URL, environment variables. Project language: TypeScript. Listed systems: macOS, Windows, Linux.
Security: what to check
Connecting an MCP server means installing software that talks straight to your agent: it runs with your rights and the model trusts its tool descriptions. The risk therefore depends on what it can touch and how far its code can be trusted.
Points found for FSB:
- System access: the Browser automation category gives the agent control over files, a terminal, code or a browser. A booby-trapped instruction in content the agent reads (prompt injection) can then turn into an action.
Good practice: grant only the rights needed (least privilege), require human approval for irreversible actions, and run the AI agent security check.
Project activity and maintenance
Created on July 29, 2025, the fullselfbrowsing/FSB repository has 203 stars and 17 forks, with 2 open issues. It has more stars than 78% of the servers in the directory. It received changes this month.
Stars measure attention, not quality: a recent, heavily promoted project can collect them fast, while a useful but niche server will have few.
Verdict
FSB is a reasonable choice; check the points below before connecting it.
Strengths
- Active project: recent commit
- Widely followed: 203 stars
- Permissive licence (MIT)
Limitations
- Install from source
Avoid if…
- You cannot isolate the agent (sandbox, container)
Alternatives
- Firecrawl MCP Server7.7K ★
- Browser use119K ★
- MCP server browser39.4K ★
- Playwright MCP38.6K ★
- SeleniumBase MCP13.1K ★
- Scrapling MCP Server89.4K ★
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
How do I install FSB?
No package is declared in the MCP registry: clone the fullselfbrowsing/FSB repository, follow its README, then declare the start command in your client's MCP configuration.
Is FSB free?
The code is published under the MIT licence and can be used free of charge.
Is FSB safe?
Points to watch: system access. Give it minimum rights and approve sensitive actions.
Is it an official server?
Nothing says so: it is a project published by fullselfbrowsing on GitHub. Check who maintains it before giving it access.
What are the alternatives to FSB?
In the same category: Firecrawl MCP Server, Browser use, MCP server browser, and Playwright MCP. Firecrawl MCP Server and Browser use score higher on our grid.
Related articles
- Build your own MCP server in 30 minutesOctober 24, 2026
- Automate your inbox with an AI agentOctober 18, 2026
- MCP, A2A, and tool calling: agent protocols explainedOctober 17, 2026
- Build an AI agent with n8n, without codingOctober 16, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score