FRENES

Monitoring and observability · MCP server

Siteaudit MCP: MCP server, setup and security

Siteaudit MCP is an open-source MCP server that lets an AI agent audit websites for SEO security performance accessibility and broken links. Its repository has 5 stars and its last commit is from April 17, 2026 and it is licensed under MIT.

Score
37/100
Adoption (stars) 7/40
Maintenance 10/30
Framework (licence, registry, official) 20/30
Last commit 6 months ago

What Siteaudit MCP does

According to its repository: “Website audits: SEO, security headers and SSL, Lighthouse performance, broken links, WCAG accessibility, Schema.org validation, competitor gaps and robots.txt.”

An MCP server gives an AI agent extra tools it calls during the conversation: the agent reads their description, decides to use them and gets the result back. Siteaudit MCP is listed under Monitoring and observability, a category of 57 servers in the directory, where it ranks #49 by stars.

Topics declared by the repository: fastmcp, seo, web-audit, accessibility, ai-tools, claude.

Installing and connecting Siteaudit MCP

Distribution modes declared in the official MCP registry:

  • PyPI package (Python, started with uvx or pip)

Like any MCP server, you declare it in your client's configuration (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, Codex…): a name, the command that starts it or its URL, and any environment variables. The client then starts it and lists its tools. Project language: Python.

Security: what to check

An MCP server runs code with the rights you give it, and the model reads its tool descriptions: a malicious or compromised server can hijack the agent. Read the code, or pick a maintained and widely used server, before connecting it.

None of the risk signals we track (system access, secrets, missing licence, abandonment) applies to Siteaudit MCP. That does not replace reading the code.

Good practice: grant only the rights needed (least privilege), require human approval for irreversible actions, and run the AI agent security check.

Project activity and maintenance

Created on April 13, 2026, the vdalhambra/siteaudit-mcp repository has 5 stars and 0 forks, with 0 open issues. It has more stars than 13% of the servers in the directory. Last change 6 months ago. Version published in the registry: 1.2.0 (April 14, 2026).

Stars measure attention, not quality: a recent, heavily promoted project can collect them fast, while a useful but niche server will have few.

NetdataNetdata : 81.1K81.1KOpenstatusOpenstatus : 9.2K9.2KOneUptimeOneUptime : 7.8K7.8KMCP grafanaMCP grafana : 3.6K3.6KMarmot Data CatalogMarmot Data Catalog : 623623Watch skillWatch skill : 520520HomebutlerHomebutler : 305305Zabbix MCP serverZabbix MCP server : 261261Siteaudit MCPSiteaudit MCP : 55
GitHub stars of the most followed servers in the category (log scale); Siteaudit MCP in orange. Checked October 25, 2026.

Verdict

Siteaudit MCP is still a modest project: read its code and compare it with the alternatives before using it.

Strengths

  • Listed in the official MCP registry
  • Permissive licence (MIT)

Limitations

  • No commit for 6 months
  • Few visible users

Frequently asked questions

How do I install Siteaudit MCP?

Siteaudit MCP is distributed as PyPI package (Python, started with uvx or pip). Add it to your client's MCP configuration (Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code…) following the README of vdalhambra/siteaudit-mcp.

Is Siteaudit MCP free?

The code is published under the MIT licence and can be used free of charge.

Is Siteaudit MCP safe?

No risk signal found (system access, secrets, licence, abandonment). As with any MCP server, keep rights minimal and read the code before sensitive use.

Is it an official server?

Nothing says so: it is a project published by vdalhambra on GitHub. Check who maintains it before giving it access.

What are the alternatives to Siteaudit MCP?

In the same category: Netdata, MCP grafana, Openstatus, and OneUptime. Netdata and MCP grafana score higher on our grid.

Related articles

Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score