FRENES

Z.ai (Zhipu) · language model

GLM 4.7 Flash: pricing, context and benchmarks

GLM 4.7 Flash is a language model from Z.ai (Zhipu) released on January 19, 2026. It costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.4 per million output tokens, with a 200K-token context window. No independent score has been published for it so far.

Score
75/100
Price 25/30
Context 5/15
Features 15/15
Low costOpen weightsReasoningTool calling

What you need to know about GLM 4.7 Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash was released by Z.ai (Zhipu) (China) on January 19, 2026. It accepts text as input and produces text. Its context window reaches 200,000 tokens, larger than 36 % of the models in the registry, and it can write up to 117,964 tokens in one go.

It has been available for about 9 months, long enough for its prices and scores to have settled.

GLM 4.7 Flash pricing

On OpenRouter, GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.4 per million output tokens. Counting three tokens read for every token written, its average price is $0.146 per million, more expensive than 16 % of paid models (5.2 times cheaper than the median of $0.76).

A concrete example: a task that sends 2,000 tokens (about 1,500 words) and receives a 500-token answer costs $0.0003. At 1,000 tasks a day, budget $10 a month. The price calculator redoes this with your own volumes.

Performance and benchmarks

Epoch AI does not yet publish a capabilities index for GLM 4.7 Flash. We therefore show no made-up performance rating: only price, context and features count towards its score.

Scores published by Epoch AI on the benchmarks the site tracks:

Source: Epoch AI, Benchmarking Hub (CC BY 4.0).
BenchmarkWhat it measuresScoreDate
GPQA DiamondPhD-level science questions60.5 %—
OTIS Mock AIMEmaths competition problems58.3 %—

Features, privacy and local use

  • It supports tool calling, so it can drive an AI agent, call APIs or MCP servers.
  • It can answer in an enforced JSON format (structured outputs).
  • It is a reasoning model: it "thinks" before answering, which helps on hard tasks but uses more output tokens.

Its weights are open and downloadable from Hugging Face (mit licence): you can run it on your own machines without sending your data to a third party. With 31,221,488,576 billion parameters, it needs about 17,446,366,274 GB of memory at 4-bit quantisation. Check with the VRAM calculator. It was downloaded 977,416 times on Hugging Face last month.

Other Z.ai (Zhipu) models

Average price per million tokens (3 input for 1 output).
ModelReleasedAvg. priceECI
GLM 5.3 PrimeSep 23, 2026$4.3—
GLM 5.3 FlashXSep 18, 2026$0.59—
GLM 5.3 FlashAug 26, 2026$0.24153.1
GLM 5.3Aug 18, 2026$0.41156
GLM 5.2Jun 16, 2026$1.78151.9
GLM 5.1Apr 7, 2026$2.15149.8
GLM 5V TurboApr 1, 2026$1.9—
GLM 5 TurboMar 15, 2026$1.9—

Verdict

GLM 4.7 Flash scores 75/100 on our grid, which only uses published figures.

Strengths

  • Low price: cheaper than 84 % of paid models.
  • Open weights: self-hostable, your data stays with you.
  • Agent-ready: tool calling and structured JSON output.

Limitations

  • No independent score published: performance cannot be verified.
  • Text only: reads neither images nor files.

Avoid if…

  • you want to host it on a single consumer computer (≈ 17,446,366,274 GB needed at 4-bit).

Frequently asked questions

How much does GLM 4.7 Flash cost?

$0.06 per million input tokens and $0.4 per million output tokens on OpenRouter (checked October 25, 2026). A task with 2,000 tokens read and 500 written costs $0.0003.

How big is GLM 4.7 Flash's context window?

200,000 tokens, roughly 150,000 words, with a maximum of 117,964 output tokens.

Can GLM 4.7 Flash run locally?

Yes, its weights are published under the mit licence. Expect about 17,446,366,274 GB of memory at 4-bit.

Is GLM 4.7 Flash suitable for an AI agent?

Technically yes: it supports tool calling and structured outputs. Then check its cost for your volume.

What are the alternatives to GLM 4.7 Flash?

The closest models on price and performance are Gemma 3 27B, Qwen3 32B, and gpt-oss-safeguard-20b.

Related articles

Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score