Prism ML · language model
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: pricing, context and benchmarks
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is Prism ML's model released on September 18, 2026. It costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.5 per million output tokens, with a 262.1K-token context window. No independent score has been published for it so far.
| Price | 24/30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Context | 9/15 | |
| Features | 15/15 |
What you need to know about Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
Prism ML put Ternary Bonsai 2 27B online on September 18, 2026. It accepts text and images as input and produces text. Its context window reaches 262,144 tokens, larger than 58 % of the models in the registry, and it can write up to 32,768 tokens in one go.
It is a recent model: real-world feedback and independent scores are still scarce.
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B pricing
On OpenRouter, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.5 per million output tokens. Counting three tokens read for every token written, its average price is $0.181 per million, more expensive than 20 % of paid models (4.2 times cheaper than the median of $0.76).
A concrete example: a task that sends 2,000 tokens (about 1,500 words) and receives a 500-token answer costs $0.0004. At 1,000 tasks a day, budget $12 a month. The price calculator redoes this with your own volumes.
Tokens already sent and cached are billed at $0.038 per million.
Performance and benchmarks
Epoch AI does not yet publish a capabilities index for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B. We therefore show no made-up performance rating: only price, context and features count towards its score.
Features, privacy and local use
- It supports tool calling, so it can drive an AI agent, call APIs or MCP servers.
- It can answer in an enforced JSON format (structured outputs).
- It is a reasoning model: it "thinks" before answering, which helps on hard tasks but uses more output tokens.
Its weights are open and downloadable from Hugging Face (apache-2.0 licence): you can run it on your own machines without sending your data to a third party. With 26,895,998,464 billion parameters, it needs about 15,029,310,322 GB of memory at 4-bit quantisation. Check with the VRAM calculator. It was downloaded 2,272,409 times on Hugging Face last month.
Verdict
Computed score: 80/100, from public data (performance, price, context, features).
Strengths
- Low price: cheaper than 80 % of paid models.
- Open weights: self-hostable, your data stays with you.
- Agent-ready: tool calling and structured JSON output.
Limitations
- No independent score published: performance cannot be verified.
Avoid if…
- you want to host it on a single consumer computer (≈ 15,029,310,322 GB needed at 4-bit).
Alternatives
- Qwen3.5-9B$0.19
- Seed-2.0-Mini$0.18
- Ministral 3 14B 2512$0.2
- Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.21
- Step 3.5 Flash$0.15
- Ministral 3 8B 2512$0.15
Comparisons and tools
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
How much does Ternary Bonsai 2 27B cost?
$0.08 per million input tokens and $0.5 per million output tokens on OpenRouter (checked October 25, 2026). A task with 2,000 tokens read and 500 written costs $0.0004.
How big is Ternary Bonsai 2 27B's context window?
262,144 tokens, roughly 197,000 words, with a maximum of 32,768 output tokens.
Can Ternary Bonsai 2 27B run locally?
Yes, its weights are published under the apache-2.0 licence. Expect about 15,029,310,322 GB of memory at 4-bit.
Is Ternary Bonsai 2 27B suitable for an AI agent?
Technically yes: it supports tool calling and structured outputs. Then check its cost for your volume.
What are the alternatives to Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?
The closest models on price and performance are Qwen3.5-9B, Seed-2.0-Mini, and Ministral 3 14B 2512.
Related articles
- Mistral AI: models, pricing and agentsOctober 25, 2026
- LLM benchmarks: how to read model rankingsOctober 24, 2026
- Running a local LLM: hardware, software, and limitationsOctober 24, 2026
- Open-source or closed models for your AI agents?October 5, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score