Chat interfaces · agent platform
big-AGI: review, pricing, security and alternatives
big-AGI is an open-source agent platform published by enricoros, in the chat interfaces family. A self-hostable multimodel web interface combining chats, personas, image generation, voice and code execution. Its repository has 7,151 stars and its last commit is from October 23, 2026.
What big-AGI does
big-AGI belongs to the chat interfaces family: multi-model chat interfaces, often self-hostable, with built-in tools, agents and MCP servers. On our grid it ranks #7 of the 17 projects of this family listed in the directory.
You use it from: web app. Usable models: GPT (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic), DeepSeek, Gemini (Google), and local models (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM…). It can run on your own machine or server.
Who is big-AGI for?
It targets people who want a single chat interface for several models, often self-hosted, with tools and agents plugged in. Typical tasks people give it:
- chat with several models from one window
- share an internal assistant with a team
- connect documents and tools to the chat
It is a good candidate if you prefer doing everything in a browser, with no install, your data must stay on your machines, and you want the option of a local model, with no API fees.
Access and human control
Its documentation does not detail the access granted to the agent: check the settings before connecting it to your accounts.
We could not establish whether it asks for human approval before sensitive actions: test it first on an unimportant account or folder.
big-AGI pricing
The code is free, under the MIT licence.
Getting started with big-AGI
- Install it: the project ships as a Node.js package (install with
npm, or run directly withnpx). The exact command is in the repository README. - Pick the model: an API key from a provider, or a local model if your machine has enough graphics memory (the VRAM calculator tells you).
- Give it a first playground with nothing at stake: a test folder, a secondary account or a throwaway project. Only open your real accounts once you have seen how it behaves.
- Give it a short, checkable task, review the result and its action log, then raise the difficulty step by step.
Security: risk level
The interface stores your API keys and conversation history: protect its access and backups.
Three habits: least privilege (minimal rights, dedicated keys), human approval for irreversible actions, a sandbox for code execution. The AI agent security check reviews your setup in a few minutes.
Project activity and releases
Created on March 19, 2023, the enricoros/big-AGI repository has 7,151 stars, 1,591 forks and 163 open issues, with 9,009 commits in total. It received changes this month.
Over the last 52 weeks: 2,509 commits, an average of 48.3 per week.
23 releases in total; 7 in the last twelve months. Latest release: v2.1.0, on August 21, 2026.
big-AGI vs other chat interfaces
GitHub stars of the best-rated open-source projects in the chat interfaces family. Stars measure attention, not quality: a heavily promoted project collects them fast, a specialised tool will have few.
big-AGI and other chat interfaces at a glance
The 7 best-ranked agents in the same family, 7 of them open source. The score out of 100 only applies to open-source projects; for proprietary services we show the published entry price. A dash marks information the documentation does not state.
| Agent | Model | Score | Stars or entry price | Self-hostable | Human approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| big-AGI | open source | 74 | 7.2K ★ | yes | – |
| AnythingLLM | open source | 89 | 67.5K ★ | yes | – |
| Cherry Studio | open source | 88 | 52.9K ★ | yes | – |
| AionUi | open source | 85 | 33.7K ★ | yes | – |
| Happy | open source | 84 | 24.3K ★ | yes | – |
| Open WebUI | open source | 83 | 156.6K ★ | yes | – |
| CopilotKit | open source | 81 | 38.2K ★ | yes | – |
| Locally Uncensored | open source | 72 | 2.5K ★ | yes | – |
How we rated it
Score: 74/100, computed only from public, verifiable data, with no subjective testing or partnership:
- Adoption 22/40: 7,151 stars on a log scale (40 points from about 200,000).
- Activity 27/30: last commit less than a month ago, 2 releases in six months, 2,509 commits in a year.
- Framework 25/30: licence, default human approval, self-hosting, model choice and documentation site.
The score does not say whether the agent will succeed at your tasks: it measures how solid the project is. The full grid is on the method page.
Verdict
big-AGI is a serious option; check the limitations below before granting it access.
Strengths
- Very active development
- Frequent releases (7 in a year)
- Can run on your side: data under control
- Free choice of model
- Permissive licence (MIT)
Alternatives
- AnythingLLM67.5K ★
- Cherry Studio52.9K ★
- AionUi33.7K ★
- Happy24.3K ★
- Open WebUI156.6K ★
- CopilotKit38.2K ★
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
Is big-AGI free?
The software is free (MIT licence). You still pay for the model calls, unless you use a local model.
Is big-AGI safe?
Our risk level: low. Give it minimum rights and approve irreversible actions.
Which models does big-AGI use?
According to its documentation: GPT (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic), DeepSeek, Gemini (Google), and local models (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM…).
Can big-AGI be installed on your own server?
Yes, from the enricoros/big-AGI repository. Data then stays with you, but security and updates are your job.
What are the alternatives to big-AGI?
In the same family: AnythingLLM, Cherry Studio, AionUi, and Happy.
big-AGI or AnythingLLM: what is the difference?
Both belong to the chat interfaces family. Big-AGI has 7.2K stars against 67.5K for AnythingLLM. The right choice mostly depends on the access you are willing to give it.
Related articles
- Open source or proprietary AI agent: how to decideOctober 25, 2026
- AI agent vs. chatbot: what's the difference?October 24, 2026
- Autonomous AI agents: how much should you let them do?October 12, 2026
- AI agent memory: how agents remember (and forget)October 11, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score