Chat interfaces · agent framework
CopilotKit: review, pricing, security and alternatives
CopilotKit is an open-source agent framework published by CopilotKit, in the chat interfaces family. CopilotKit supplies frontend components and integrations that connect application interfaces to agents and their tools. Its repository has 38,210 stars and its last commit is from October 24, 2026.
What CopilotKit does
CopilotKit belongs to the chat interfaces family: multi-model chat interfaces, often self-hostable, with built-in tools, agents and MCP servers. On our grid it ranks #6 of the 17 projects of this family listed in the directory.
Unlike a ready-made agent, a framework provides the parts to build one: tool calling, step sequencing, memory, coordination of several agents. It is aimed at teams that want a custom agent.
You use it from: developer SDK. It can run on your own machine or server.
Who is CopilotKit for?
It targets people who want a single chat interface for several models, often self-hosted, with tools and agents plugged in. Typical tasks people give it:
- chat with several models from one window
- share an internal assistant with a team
- connect documents and tools to the chat
It is a good candidate if your data must stay on your machines.
Access and human control
A framework has no access of its own: the tools you plug in define what the agent can do. Start with read-only tools.
We could not establish whether it asks for human approval before sensitive actions: test it first on an unimportant account or folder.
CopilotKit pricing
The code is free, under the MIT licence.
Getting started with CopilotKit
- Install it: the project ships as a Node.js package (install with
npm, or run directly withnpx). The exact command is in the repository README. - Create an API key with the model provider and put it in an environment variable, never in a shared or versioned file.
- Start with the minimal example from the docs, then add one tool at a time and check what the agent does with it.
- Give it a short, checkable task, review the result and its action log, then raise the difficulty step by step.
Security: risk level
The interface stores your API keys and conversation history: protect its access and backups.
Three habits: least privilege (minimal rights, dedicated keys), human approval for irreversible actions, a sandbox for code execution. The AI agent security check reviews your setup in a few minutes.
Project activity and releases
Created on June 19, 2023, the CopilotKit/CopilotKit repository has 38,210 stars, 4,769 forks and 105 open issues, with 18,842 commits in total. It received changes this month.
Over the last 52 weeks: 16,132 commits, an average of 310.2 per week.
1,480 releases in total; 30 in the last twelve months. Latest release: channels/v0.11.1, on October 16, 2026.
CopilotKit vs other chat interfaces
GitHub stars of the best-rated open-source projects in the chat interfaces family. Stars measure attention, not quality: a heavily promoted project collects them fast, a specialised tool will have few.
CopilotKit and other chat interfaces at a glance
The 7 best-ranked agents in the same family, 7 of them open source. The score out of 100 only applies to open-source projects; for proprietary services we show the published entry price. A dash marks information the documentation does not state.
| Agent | Model | Score | Stars or entry price | Self-hostable | Human approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CopilotKit | open source | 81 | 38.2K ★ | yes | – |
| AnythingLLM | open source | 89 | 67.5K ★ | yes | – |
| Cherry Studio | open source | 88 | 52.9K ★ | yes | – |
| AionUi | open source | 85 | 33.7K ★ | yes | – |
| Happy | open source | 84 | 24.3K ★ | yes | – |
| Open WebUI | open source | 83 | 156.6K ★ | yes | – |
| big-AGI | open source | 74 | 7.2K ★ | yes | – |
| Locally Uncensored | open source | 72 | 2.5K ★ | yes | – |
How we rated it
Score: 81/100, computed only from public, verifiable data, with no subjective testing or partnership:
- Adoption 31/40: 38,210 stars on a log scale (40 points from about 200,000).
- Activity 30/30: last commit less than a month ago, 30 releases in six months, 16,132 commits in a year.
- Framework 20/30: licence, default human approval, self-hosting, model choice and documentation site.
The score does not say whether the agent will succeed at your tasks: it measures how solid the project is. The full grid is on the method page.
Verdict
CopilotKit is one of the most solid projects in its family: followed, active and well framed.
Strengths
- Widely followed: 38.2K stars
- Very active development
- Frequent releases (30 in a year)
- Can run on your side: data under control
- Permissive licence (MIT)
Limitations
- Requires programming skills
Avoid if…
- You want a ready-made agent, without code
Alternatives
- AnythingLLM67.5K ★
- Cherry Studio52.9K ★
- AionUi33.7K ★
- Happy24.3K ★
- Open WebUI156.6K ★
- big-AGI7.2K ★
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
Is CopilotKit free?
The software is free (MIT licence). You still pay for the model calls, unless you use a local model.
Is CopilotKit safe?
Our risk level: low. Give it minimum rights and approve irreversible actions.
Which models does CopilotKit use?
Its documentation does not specify the supported models.
Can CopilotKit be installed on your own server?
Yes, from the CopilotKit/CopilotKit repository. Data then stays with you, but security and updates are your job.
What are the alternatives to CopilotKit?
In the same family: AnythingLLM, Cherry Studio, AionUi, and Happy.
CopilotKit or AnythingLLM: what is the difference?
Both belong to the chat interfaces family. CopilotKit has 38.2K stars against 67.5K for AnythingLLM. The right choice mostly depends on the access you are willing to give it.
Related articles
- Open source or proprietary AI agent: how to decideOctober 25, 2026
- AI agent vs. chatbot: what's the difference?October 24, 2026
- Autonomous AI agents: how much should you let them do?October 12, 2026
- AI agent memory: how agents remember (and forget)October 11, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score