FRENES

Chat interfaces · agent infrastructure component

Happy: review, pricing, security and alternatives

Happy is an open-source agent infrastructure component published by slopus, in the chat interfaces family. Happy brings Claude Code, Codex, and Grok sessions into one application that works with users’ existing subscriptions. Its repository has 24,292 stars and its last commit is from October 24, 2026.

Open sourceSelf-hostableActively maintainedLow risk

What Happy does

Happy belongs to the chat interfaces family: multi-model chat interfaces, often self-hostable, with built-in tools, agents and MCP servers. On our grid it ranks #4 of the 17 projects of this family listed in the directory.

It is not an agent in itself: it is a component other agents use (memory, isolated execution, web access, model gateway or monitoring). You pick it based on the agent or framework it has to equip.

You use it from: terminal (CLI), web app, and mobile app. Usable models: Claude (Anthropic), GPT (OpenAI), and Grok (xAI). It can run on your own machine or server.

Who is Happy for?

It targets people who want a single chat interface for several models, often self-hosted, with tools and agents plugged in. Typical tasks people give it:

  • chat with several models from one window
  • share an internal assistant with a team
  • connect documents and tools to the chat

It is a good candidate if you are comfortable in a terminal and your data must stay on your machines.

Access and human control

Its documentation does not detail the access granted to the agent: check the settings before connecting it to your accounts.

We could not establish whether it asks for human approval before sensitive actions: test it first on an unimportant account or folder.

Run commands in a terminalRun commands in a terminal : 6 %6 %Read and edit filesRead and edit files : 18 %18 %Drive a web browserDrive a web browser : 12 %12 %Call online services and APIsCall online services and APIs : 6 %6 %Read and send messagesRead and send messages : 12 %12 %Control the screen, keyboard and mControl the screen, keyboard and m : 6 %6 %
Share of the 17 agents in the family that have each access, according to their documentation. In orange, Happy's access.

Happy pricing

The code is free, under the MIT licence.

Getting started with Happy

  1. Install it: the project ships as a Node.js package (install with npm, or run directly with npx). The exact command is in the repository README.
  2. Start with the minimal example from the docs, then add one tool at a time and check what the agent does with it.
  3. Give it a short, checkable task, review the result and its action log, then raise the difficulty step by step.

Security: risk level

The interface stores your API keys and conversation history: protect its access and backups.

Three habits: least privilege (minimal rights, dedicated keys), human approval for irreversible actions, a sandbox for code execution. The AI agent security check reviews your setup in a few minutes.

Project activity and releases

Created on July 18, 2025, the slopus/happy repository has 24,292 stars, 2,082 forks and 664 open issues, with 3,576 commits in total. It received changes this month.

Over the last 52 weeks: 2,020 commits, an average of 38.8 per week.

Nov 2, : 6 · Nov 2, 2025Nov 2,Nov 9, : 13 · Nov 9, 2025Nov 16, : 3 · Nov 16, 2025Nov 23, : 157 · Nov 23, 2025Nov 30, : 15 · Nov 30, 2025Dec 7, : 16 · Dec 7, 2025Dec 14, : 8 · Dec 14, 2025Dec 21, : 23 · Dec 21, 2025Dec 28, : 24 · Dec 28, 2025Dec 28,Jan 4, : 6 · Jan 4, 2026Jan 11, : 29 · Jan 11, 2026Jan 18, : 22 · Jan 18, 2026Jan 25, : 17 · Jan 25, 2026Feb 1, : 15 · Feb 1, 2026Feb 8, : 1 · Feb 8, 2026Feb 15, : 65 · Feb 15, 2026Feb 22, : 2 · Feb 22, 2026Feb 22,Mar 1, : 14 · Mar 1, 2026Mar 8, : 45 · Mar 8, 2026Mar 15, : 6 · Mar 15, 2026Mar 22, : 38 · Mar 22, 2026Mar 29, : 58 · Mar 29, 2026Apr 5, : 17 · Apr 5, 2026Apr 12, : 27 · Apr 12, 2026Apr 19, : 99 · Apr 19, 2026Apr 19,Apr 26, : 43 · Apr 26, 2026May 3, : 38 · May 3, 2026May 10, : 82 · May 10, 2026May 17, : 45 · May 17, 2026May 24, : 22 · May 24, 2026May 31, : 6 · May 31, 2026Jun 7, : 8 · Jun 7, 2026Jun 14, : 7 · Jun 14, 2026Jun 14,Jun 21, : 0 · Jun 21, 2026Jun 28, : 5 · Jun 28, 2026Jul 5, : 3 · Jul 5, 2026Jul 12, : 11 · Jul 12, 2026Jul 19, : 13 · Jul 19, 2026Jul 26, : 19 · Jul 26, 2026Aug 2, : 11 · Aug 2, 2026Aug 9, : 19 · Aug 9, 2026Aug 9,Aug 16, : 3 · Aug 16, 2026Aug 23, : 23 · Aug 23, 2026Aug 30, : 94 · Aug 30, 2026Sep 6, : 9 · Sep 6, 2026Sep 13, : 17 · Sep 13, 2026Sep 20, : 36 · Sep 20, 2026Sep 27, : 40 · Sep 27, 2026Oct 4, : 16 · Oct 4, 2026Oct 4,Oct 11, : 36 · Oct 11, 2026Oct 18, : 598 · Oct 18, 2026Oct 25, : 90 · Oct 25, 2026Oct 25,
Commits per week on the main repository, last 52 weeks (GitHub API, checked October 25, 2026).

16 releases in total; 10 in the last twelve months. Latest release: cli-1.2.5, on September 22, 2026.

v1.1.6 · Apr 13, 2026v1.1.6Apr 13, 2026v1.1.5 · Apr 13, 2026cli-1.1.7 · Apr 20, 2026cli-1.1.8 · Apr 27, 2026cli-1.1.10 · Jun 23, 2026cli-1.2.1 · Aug 25, 2026cli-1.2.2 · Aug 27, 2026cli-1.2.3 · Sep 5, 2026cli-1.2.4 · Sep 13, 2026cli-1.2.5 · Sep 22, 2026cli-1.2.5Sep 22, 2026
The latest 10 releases published on GitHub (hover a point for details).

Happy vs other chat interfaces

GitHub stars of the best-rated open-source projects in the chat interfaces family. Stars measure attention, not quality: a heavily promoted project collects them fast, a specialised tool will have few.

AnythingLLMAnythingLLM : 67.5K67.5KCherry StudioCherry Studio : 52.9K52.9KAionUiAionUi : 33.7K33.7KHappyHappy : 24.3K24.3KOpen WebUIOpen WebUI : 156.6K156.6KCopilotKitCopilotKit : 38.2K38.2Kbig-AGIbig-AGI : 7.2K7.2KLocally UncensoredLocally Uncensored : 2.5K2.5K
Log scale; Happy in orange. Checked October 25, 2026.

Happy and other chat interfaces at a glance

The 7 best-ranked agents in the same family, 7 of them open source. The score out of 100 only applies to open-source projects; for proprietary services we show the published entry price. A dash marks information the documentation does not state.

Quick comparison: chat interfaces
AgentModelScoreStars or entry priceSelf-hostableHuman approval
Happyopen source8424.3K ★yes–
AnythingLLMopen source8967.5K ★yes–
Cherry Studioopen source8852.9K ★yes–
AionUiopen source8533.7K ★yes–
Open WebUIopen source83156.6K ★yes–
CopilotKitopen source8138.2K ★yes–
big-AGIopen source747.2K ★yes–
Locally Uncensoredopen source722.5K ★yes–

How we rated it

Score: 84/100, computed only from public, verifiable data, with no subjective testing or partnership:

  • Adoption 29/40: 24,292 stars on a log scale (40 points from about 200,000).
  • Activity 30/30: last commit less than a month ago, 7 releases in six months, 2,020 commits in a year.
  • Framework 25/30: licence, default human approval, self-hosting, model choice and documentation site.

The score does not say whether the agent will succeed at your tasks: it measures how solid the project is. The full grid is on the method page.

Verdict

Happy is one of the most solid projects in its family: followed, active and well framed.

Strengths

  • Widely followed: 24.3K stars
  • Very active development
  • Frequent releases (10 in a year)
  • Can run on your side: data under control
  • Free choice of model

Frequently asked questions

Is Happy free?

The software is free (MIT licence). You still pay for the model calls, unless you use a local model.

Is Happy safe?

Our risk level: low. Give it minimum rights and approve irreversible actions.

Which models does Happy use?

According to its documentation: Claude (Anthropic), GPT (OpenAI), and Grok (xAI).

Can Happy be installed on your own server?

Yes, from the slopus/happy repository. Data then stays with you, but security and updates are your job.

What are the alternatives to Happy?

In the same family: AnythingLLM, Cherry Studio, AionUi, and Open WebUI.

Happy or AnythingLLM: what is the difference?

Both belong to the chat interfaces family. Happy has 24.3K stars against 67.5K for AnythingLLM. The right choice mostly depends on the access you are willing to give it.

Related articles

Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score