Deep research · agent framework
MindSearch: review, pricing, security and alternatives
MindSearch is an open-source agent framework published by InternLM, in the deep research family. A web search framework that coordinates multiple language model agents to explore online sources and synthesize their findings. Its repository has 6,946 stars and its last commit is from July 4, 2025.
What MindSearch does
MindSearch belongs to the deep research family: agents that search, read and cross-check dozens of sources to produce a sourced report. On our grid it ranks #17 of the 18 projects of this family listed in the directory.
Unlike a ready-made agent, a framework provides the parts to build one: tool calling, step sequencing, memory, coordination of several agents. It is aimed at teams that want a custom agent.
You use it from: web app and API. Usable models: GPT (OpenAI) and local models (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM…). It can run on your own machine or server.
Who is MindSearch for?
It targets analysts, students and teams who must cross-check many sources to produce a reasoned summary. Typical tasks people give it:
- write a sourced overview of a topic
- compare products or competitors
- prepare a technical or regulatory watch
It is a good candidate if you prefer doing everything in a browser, with no install, your data must stay on your machines, and you want the option of a local model, with no API fees.
Access and human control
A framework has no access of its own: the tools you plug in define what the agent can do. Start with read-only tools.
We could not establish whether it asks for human approval before sensitive actions: test it first on an unimportant account or folder.
MindSearch pricing
The code is free, under the Apache-2.0 licence.
Getting started with MindSearch
- Install it: the project ships as a Node.js package (install with
npm, or run directly withnpx). The exact command is in the repository README. - Pick the model: an API key from a provider, or a local model if your machine has enough graphics memory (the VRAM calculator tells you).
- Start with the minimal example from the docs, then add one tool at a time and check what the agent does with it.
- Give it a short, checkable task, review the result and its action log, then raise the difficulty step by step.
Security: risk level
An agent's report may cite misread or invented sources: check the links before reusing a figure.
Points found for MindSearch:
- Maintenance: no commit for 16 months, flaws are no longer fixed.
Three habits: least privilege (minimal rights, dedicated keys), human approval for irreversible actions, a sandbox for code execution. The AI agent security check reviews your setup in a few minutes.
Project activity and releases
Created on July 28, 2024, the InternLM/MindSearch repository has 6,946 stars, 692 forks and 48 open issues, with 56 commits in total. Last change 16 months ago.
Over the last 52 weeks: 0 commits, an average of 0 per week.
1 releases in total; 0 in the last twelve months. Latest release: v0.1.0, on November 5, 2024.
MindSearch vs other deep research
GitHub stars of the best-rated open-source projects in the deep research family. Stars measure attention, not quality: a heavily promoted project collects them fast, a specialised tool will have few.
MindSearch and other deep research at a glance
The 7 best-ranked agents in the same family, 7 of them open source. The score out of 100 only applies to open-source projects; for proprietary services we show the published entry price. A dash marks information the documentation does not state.
| Agent | Model | Score | Stars or entry price | Self-hostable | Human approval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MindSearch | open source | 42 | 6.9K ★ | yes | – |
| DeerFlow | open source | 87 | 84.4K ★ | yes | – |
| GPT Researcher | open source | 80 | 30.3K ★ | yes | – |
| Open Science | open source | 76 | 5.4K ★ | yes | – |
| Feynman | open source | 74 | 10K ★ | yes | – |
| Local Deep Research | open source | 74 | 9.4K ★ | yes | – |
| OpenScience | open source | 70 | 4.2K ★ | yes | – |
| LLM for Zotero | open source | 68 | 3.4K ★ | yes | – |
How we rated it
Score: 42/100, computed only from public, verifiable data, with no subjective testing or partnership:
- Adoption 22/40: 6,946 stars on a log scale (40 points from about 200,000).
- Activity 0/30: last commit 16 months ago, 0 releases in six months, 0 commits in a year.
- Framework 20/30: licence, default human approval, self-hosting, model choice and documentation site.
The score does not say whether the agent will succeed at your tasks: it measures how solid the project is. The full grid is on the method page.
Verdict
MindSearch is a project to watch: compare it with the alternatives before adopting it.
Strengths
- Can run on your side: data under control
- Free choice of model
- Permissive licence (Apache-2.0)
Limitations
- No commit for 16 months
- Requires programming skills
Avoid if…
- You want a ready-made agent, without code
- Production use without reviewing the code
Alternatives
- DeerFlow84.4K ★
- GPT Researcher30.3K ★
- Open Science5.4K ★
- Feynman10K ★
- Local Deep Research9.4K ★
- OpenScience4.2K ★
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
Is MindSearch free?
The software is free (Apache-2.0 licence). You still pay for the model calls, unless you use a local model.
Is MindSearch safe?
Our risk level: mid. Points found: maintenance. Give it minimum rights and approve irreversible actions.
Which models does MindSearch use?
According to its documentation: GPT (OpenAI) and local models (Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM…).
Can MindSearch be installed on your own server?
Yes, from the InternLM/MindSearch repository. Data then stays with you, but security and updates are your job.
What are the alternatives to MindSearch?
In the same family: DeerFlow, GPT Researcher, Open Science, and Feynman.
MindSearch or DeerFlow: what is the difference?
Both belong to the deep research family. MindSearch has 6.9K stars against 84.4K for DeerFlow. The right choice mostly depends on the access you are willing to give it.
Related articles
- Open source or proprietary AI agent: how to decideOctober 25, 2026
- AI agent vs. chatbot: what's the difference?October 24, 2026
- Autonomous AI agents: how much should you let them do?October 12, 2026
- AI agent memory: how agents remember (and forget)October 11, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score