Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Sonnet 5
Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) and Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Claude Opus 4.8 | Claude Sonnet 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Released | May 28, 2026 | June 30, 2026 |
| Capability index | 83.4 / 100 | 79.3 / 100 |
| Input price | $5 | $2 |
| Output price | $25 | $10 |
| Cost of a typical task | $0.15 | $0.06 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 128,000 tokens | 50,000 tokens |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text, image, PDF | text, image, PDF |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Knowledge cutoff | January 2026 | January 31, 2026 |
Two models head to head
Claude Opus 4.8 and Claude Sonnet 5 are two mid-range models, balancing quality and cost, both built by Anthropic. Claude Opus 4.8 was released on May 28, 2026, Claude Sonnet 5 on June 30, 2026.
All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.
What the benchmarks say
On our capability index, Claude Opus 4.8 scores 83.4 out of 100 and Claude Sonnet 5 79.3. Claude Opus 4.8 leads by 4.1 points.
On the 5 benchmarks reported for both, Claude Opus 4.8 wins 4 times and Claude Sonnet 5 1:
- GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): Claude Opus 4.8 91%, Claude Sonnet 5 90.5%
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): Claude Opus 4.8 98.3%, Claude Sonnet 5 94.7%
- FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): Claude Opus 4.8 80%, Claude Sonnet 5 65.6%
- FrontierCode (advanced programming tasks): Claude Opus 4.8 46.5%, Claude Sonnet 5 42.7%
- APEX-Agents (professional tasks carried out by an agent): Claude Opus 4.8 48.9%, Claude Sonnet 5 54.5%
Which one costs less?
Claude Opus 4.8 costs $5 per million input tokens and $25 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2 and $10.
For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.15 with Claude Opus 4.8 versus $0.06 with Claude Sonnet 5. Claude Sonnet 5 is 2.5 times cheaper, a gap that adds up quickly over 1,000 tasks: $90 difference.
Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.
Under the hood
Both models have the same context window: 1,000,000 tokens, roughly 1,500 pages.
Reasoning mode: Claude Opus 4.8 yes, Claude Sonnet 5 yes. Tool calling: Claude Opus 4.8 yes, Claude Sonnet 5 yes. Image input: Claude Opus 4.8 yes, Claude Sonnet 5 yes.
Neither publishes its weights: both are used through an API.
Knowledge cutoff: January 2026 for Claude Opus 4.8, January 31, 2026 for Claude Sonnet 5.
In short
Our reading of the data:
- Choose Claude Opus 4.8 for a higher capability index.
- Choose Claude Sonnet 5 for a lower cost.
This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Claude Opus 4.8 or Claude Sonnet 5: which is better?
On our index (Epoch AI data), Claude Opus 4.8 scores 83.4 and Claude Sonnet 5 79.3 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.
Which one is cheaper?
Claude Sonnet 5. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.15 with Claude Opus 4.8 and $0.06 with Claude Sonnet 5 (prices as of October 22, 2026).
Which one has the larger context window?
Neither: both accept 1,000,000 tokens.
Can I run Claude Opus 4.8 or Claude Sonnet 5 on my own servers?
No: both are closed models, available through an API.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.