Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5 Mini
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (Google DeepMind) and GPT-5 Mini (OpenAI) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | GPT-5 Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | OpenAI |
| Released | May 7, 2026 | August 7, 2025 |
| Capability index | 64.3 / 100 | 62.9 / 100 |
| Input price | $0.25 | $0.25 |
| Output price | $1.5 | $2 |
| Cost of a typical task | $0.008 | $0.009 |
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens | 272,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 65,536 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text, image, video, audio, PDF | text, image |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Knowledge cutoff | January 2025 | May 30, 2024 |
The match-up at a glance
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and GPT-5 Mini are two budget models, built for high volumes at a low price, one from Google DeepMind, the other from OpenAI. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite was released on May 7, 2026, GPT-5 Mini on August 7, 2025.
All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.
What the benchmarks say
On our capability index, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores 64.3 out of 100 and GPT-5 Mini 62.9. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads by 1.4 points.
On the 4 benchmarks reported for both, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite wins 1 time and GPT-5 Mini 3:
- GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 81.8%, GPT-5 Mini 75%
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 80%, GPT-5 Mini 86.7%
- FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 27.7%, GPT-5 Mini 46.7%
- Humanity's Last Exam (multidisciplinary expert questions): Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 8.6%, GPT-5 Mini 19.4%
Pricing
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.5 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Mini costs $0.25 and $2.
For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.008 with Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite versus $0.009 with GPT-5 Mini. The cost is almost the same.
Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.
Under the hood
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite reads more in one go: 1,048,576 tokens of context (roughly 1,573 pages), versus 272,000 for GPT-5 Mini.
Reasoning mode: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite yes, GPT-5 Mini yes. Tool calling: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite yes, GPT-5 Mini yes. Image input: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite yes, GPT-5 Mini yes.
Neither publishes its weights: both are used through an API.
Knowledge cutoff: January 2025 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, May 30, 2024 for GPT-5 Mini.
In short
Our reading of the data:
- Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite for a higher capability index, a larger context window and a more recent release.
This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5 Mini: which is better?
On our index (Epoch AI data), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores 64.3 and GPT-5 Mini 62.9 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.
Which one is cheaper?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.008 with Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and $0.009 with GPT-5 Mini (prices as of October 22, 2026).
Which one has the larger context window?
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, with 1,048,576 tokens versus 272,000.
Can I run Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5 Mini on my own servers?
No: both are closed models, available through an API.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.