GPT-6 Astra versus Qwen3.8 Max 0902
GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI) and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (Alibaba Cloud (Qwen)) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.
Data as of October 22, 2026
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | GPT-6 Astra | Qwen3.8 Max 0902 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | Alibaba Cloud (Qwen) |
| Released | September 4, 2026 | September 2, 2026 |
| Capability index | 94.7 / 100 | 88.4 / 100 |
| Input price | $10 | $2 |
| Output price | $50 | $6 |
| Cost of a typical task | $0.30 | $0.052 |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 128,000 tokens | 50,000 tokens |
| Reasoning mode | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Accepted inputs | text, image, PDF | text, image, video, PDF |
| Open weights | No | No |
| Knowledge cutoff | April 30, 2026 | Not disclosed |
Two models head to head
GPT-6 Astra and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 are two frontier models, the ones you pick when quality comes first, one from OpenAI, the other from Alibaba Cloud (Qwen). GPT-6 Astra was released on September 4, 2026, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 on September 2, 2026.
All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.
What the benchmarks say
On our capability index, GPT-6 Astra scores 94.7 out of 100 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 88.4. GPT-6 Astra leads by 6.3 points.
On the 3 benchmarks reported for both, GPT-6 Astra wins 2 times and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 0:
- GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): GPT-6 Astra 95.8%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 92.3%
- OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): GPT-6 Astra 100%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 100%
- FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): GPT-6 Astra 93.7%, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 65.6%
Budget
GPT-6 Astra costs $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max 0902 costs $2 and $6.
For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.30 with GPT-6 Astra versus $0.052 with Qwen3.8 Max 0902. Qwen3.8 Max 0902 is 5.8 times cheaper, a gap that adds up quickly over 1,000 tasks: $248 difference.
Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.
Context and capabilities
GPT-6 Astra reads more in one go: 1,050,000 tokens of context (roughly 1,575 pages), versus 1,000,000 for Qwen3.8 Max 0902.
Reasoning mode: GPT-6 Astra yes, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 yes. Tool calling: GPT-6 Astra yes, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 yes. Image input: GPT-6 Astra yes, Qwen3.8 Max 0902 yes.
Neither publishes its weights: both are used through an API.
In short
Our reading of the data:
- Choose GPT-6 Astra for a higher capability index.
- Choose Qwen3.8 Max 0902 for a lower cost.
This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
GPT-6 Astra or Qwen3.8 Max 0902: which is better?
On our index (Epoch AI data), GPT-6 Astra scores 94.7 and Qwen3.8 Max 0902 88.4 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.
Which one is cheaper?
Qwen3.8 Max 0902. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.30 with GPT-6 Astra and $0.052 with Qwen3.8 Max 0902 (prices as of October 22, 2026).
Which one has the larger context window?
GPT-6 Astra, with 1,050,000 tokens versus 1,000,000.
Can I run GPT-6 Astra or Qwen3.8 Max 0902 on my own servers?
No: both are closed models, available through an API.
Data sources
- Models.dev — Model data: models.dev (open-source project)
- OpenRouter — Market prices cross-checked with OpenRouter
- Epoch AI — AI Benchmarking Hub — Epoch AI, “AI Benchmarking Hub”, epoch.ai, CC BY 4.0
Data as of October 22, 2026
Report an error
Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.