OpenAI · language model
GPT-5 Image: pricing, context and benchmarks
GPT-5 Image is OpenAI's model released on October 14, 2025. It costs $10 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, with a 400K-token context window. No independent score has been published for it so far.
What you need to know about GPT-5 Image
OpenAI, based in United States, put GPT-5 Image online on October 14, 2025. It accepts images, text, and files as input and produces images and text. Its context window reaches 400,000 tokens, larger than 64 % of the models in the registry, and it can write up to 128,000 tokens in one go.
It has been available for about 12 months, long enough for its prices and scores to have settled.
GPT-5 Image pricing
On OpenRouter, GPT-5 Image costs $10 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens. Counting three tokens read for every token written, its average price is $10 per million, more expensive than 95 % of paid models (13.1 times the median of $0.76).
A concrete example: a task that sends 2,000 tokens (about 1,500 words) and receives a 500-token answer costs $0.025. At 1,000 tasks a day, budget $750 a month. The price calculator redoes this with your own volumes.
Tokens already sent and cached are billed at $1.25 per million.
Performance and benchmarks
Epoch AI does not yet publish a capabilities index for GPT-5 Image. We therefore show no made-up performance rating: only price, context and features count towards its score.
Features, privacy and local use
- It does not support tool calling: it is not suited to driving an AI agent that has to act.
- It can answer in an enforced JSON format (structured outputs).
- It is a reasoning model: it "thinks" before answering, which helps on hard tasks but uses more output tokens.
Its weights are not published: it can only be used through the OpenAI API or a broker such as OpenRouter, which means sending your data off your machines.
Other OpenAI models
| Model | Released | Avg. price | ECI |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol | Sep 29, 2026 | $4 | 168.4 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol Pro | Sep 29, 2026 | $4 | — |
| GPT-6 Sol | Sep 22, 2026 | $4 | 163.7 |
| GPT-6 Luna | Sep 22, 2026 | $0.2 | 156.8 |
| GPT-6 Luna Pro | Sep 22, 2026 | $0.2 | — |
| GPT-6 Sol Pro | Sep 22, 2026 | $4 | — |
| GPT-6 Astra | Sep 4, 2026 | $20 | 168.8 |
| GPT-6 Astra Pro | Sep 4, 2026 | $20 | — |
Verdict
Computed score: 30/100, from public data (performance, price, context, features).
Limitations
- Expensive: costlier than 95 % of paid models.
- No tool calling: unusable as an agent's brain.
- No independent score published: performance cannot be verified.
Avoid if…
- you process large volumes on a tight budget;
- your data must not leave your servers;
- you are building an agent that must call tools;
- your tasks are mostly simple: a non-reasoning model will cost less.
Alternatives
- Claude Opus 5$10
- Claude Opus 4.8$10
- Claude Opus 4.7$10
- Claude Opus 4.6$10
- Fugu Ultra v2$11.25
- Fugu Ultra$11.25
Comparisons and tools
Learn more
Frequently asked questions
How much does GPT-5 Image cost?
$10 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens on OpenRouter (checked October 25, 2026). A task with 2,000 tokens read and 500 written costs $0.025.
How big is GPT-5 Image's context window?
400,000 tokens, roughly 300,000 words, with a maximum of 128,000 output tokens.
Can GPT-5 Image run locally?
No, OpenAI does not publish its weights: it is API-only.
Is GPT-5 Image suitable for an AI agent?
No: without tool calling it cannot act, only answer.
What are the alternatives to GPT-5 Image?
The closest models on price and performance are Claude Opus 5, Claude Opus 4.8, and Claude Opus 4.7.
Related articles
- Mistral AI: models, pricing and agentsOctober 25, 2026
- LLM benchmarks: how to read model rankingsOctober 24, 2026
- Running a local LLM: hardware, software, and limitationsOctober 24, 2026
- Open-source or closed models for your AI agents?October 5, 2026
Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score