GLM-5.3-Flash or Muse Spark Open: which to choose?

GLM-5.3-Flash (Zhipu AI (Z.ai)) and Muse Spark Open (Meta) compared point by point: measured performance, pricing, context and capabilities.

Data as of October 22, 2026

Side-by-side comparison

CriterionGLM-5.3-FlashMuse Spark Open
DeveloperZhipu AI (Z.ai)Meta
ReleasedSeptember 18, 2026October 15, 2026
Capability index71.9 / 10075.2 / 100
Input price$0.30$1.25
Output price$1.05$4.25
Cost of a typical task$0.008$0.034
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Maximum output131,072 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Reasoning modeYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Accepted inputstext, image, video, PDFtext, image, video
Open weightsYesYes
Knowledge cutoffNot disclosedJanuary 4, 2026

What are we comparing?

GLM-5.3-Flash and Muse Spark Open are two open-weight models that you can install on your own servers, one from Zhipu AI (Z.ai), the other from Meta. GLM-5.3-Flash was released on September 18, 2026, Muse Spark Open on October 15, 2026.

All figures below come from public sources checked on October 22, 2026: models.dev and OpenRouter for prices and capabilities, Epoch AI for scores.

Which one is more capable?

On our capability index, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 71.9 out of 100 and Muse Spark Open 75.2. Muse Spark Open leads by 3.3 points.

On the 4 benchmarks reported for both, GLM-5.3-Flash wins 2 times and Muse Spark Open 2:

  • GPQA Diamond (PhD-level science questions): GLM-5.3-Flash 90.2%, Muse Spark Open 88.6%
  • OTIS Mock AIME (competition mathematics problems): GLM-5.3-Flash 93.9%, Muse Spark Open 98.1%
  • FrontierMath (very hard research-level mathematics): GLM-5.3-Flash 55.8%, Muse Spark Open 69.8%
  • APEX-Agents (professional tasks carried out by an agent): GLM-5.3-Flash 52.8%, Muse Spark Open 33.4%

Budget

GLM-5.3-Flash costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.05 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25.

For a typical agent task (read 20,000 tokens, write 2,000), expect $0.008 with GLM-5.3-Flash versus $0.034 with Muse Spark Open. GLM-5.3-Flash is 4.2 times cheaper, a gap that adds up quickly over 1,000 tasks: $25.43 difference.

Run the numbers with your own volumes in the agent cost calculator.

Features and limits

Muse Spark Open reads more in one go: 1,048,576 tokens of context (roughly 1,573 pages), versus 1,000,000 for GLM-5.3-Flash.

Reasoning mode: GLM-5.3-Flash yes, Muse Spark Open yes. Tool calling: GLM-5.3-Flash yes, Muse Spark Open yes. Image input: GLM-5.3-Flash yes, Muse Spark Open yes.

Both publish their weights: you can host them yourself.

In short

Our reading of the data:

  • Choose GLM-5.3-Flash for a lower cost.
  • Choose Muse Spark Open for a higher capability index.

This verdict relies on public figures; it does not replace a trial on your own tasks.

Other comparisons

Frequently asked questions

GLM-5.3-Flash or Muse Spark Open: which is better?

On our index (Epoch AI data), GLM-5.3-Flash scores 71.9 and Muse Spark Open 75.2 out of 100. The best choice also depends on price and on your use case.

Which one is cheaper?

GLM-5.3-Flash. To read 20,000 tokens and write 2,000, expect $0.008 with GLM-5.3-Flash and $0.034 with Muse Spark Open (prices as of October 22, 2026).

Which one has the larger context window?

Muse Spark Open, with 1,048,576 tokens versus 1,000,000.

Can I run GLM-5.3-Flash or Muse Spark Open on my own servers?

Yes, both publish their weights. Check each license before commercial use.

Data sources

Data as of October 22, 2026

Report an error

Does a figure, a date or a fact look wrong? Tell us: every report is checked.