FRENES

Z.ai (Zhipu) · language model

GLM 4.6: pricing, context and benchmarks

GLM 4.6 is a language model from Z.ai (Zhipu) released on September 30, 2025. It costs $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.2 per million output tokens, with a 204.8K-token context window. No independent score has been published for it so far.

Mid-range costOpen weightsReasoningTool calling

What you need to know about GLM 4.6

GLM 4.6 was released by Z.ai (Zhipu) (China) on September 30, 2025. It accepts text as input and produces text. Its context window reaches 204,800 tokens, larger than 39 % of the models in the registry, and it can write up to 131,072 tokens in one go.

It has been available for about 13 months, long enough for its prices and scores to have settled.

GLM 4.6 pricing

On OpenRouter, GLM 4.6 costs $0.55 per million input tokens and $2.2 per million output tokens. Counting three tokens read for every token written, its average price is $0.963 per million, more expensive than 56 % of paid models (1.3 times the median of $0.76).

A concrete example: a task that sends 2,000 tokens (about 1,500 words) and receives a 500-token answer costs $0.0022. At 1,000 tasks a day, budget $66 a month. The price calculator redoes this with your own volumes.

Tokens already sent and cached are billed at $0.11 per million.

Performance and benchmarks

Epoch AI does not yet publish a capabilities index for GLM 4.6. We therefore show no made-up performance rating: only price, context and features count towards its score.

Scores published by Epoch AI on the benchmarks the site tracks:

Source: Epoch AI, Benchmarking Hub (CC BY 4.0).
BenchmarkWhat it measuresScoreDate
Terminal-Benchreal tasks in a terminal24.5 %Sep 30, 2025

Features, privacy and local use

  • It supports tool calling, so it can drive an AI agent, call APIs or MCP servers.
  • It can answer in an enforced JSON format (structured outputs).
  • It is a reasoning model: it "thinks" before answering, which helps on hard tasks but uses more output tokens.
  • Its knowledge stops at March 2025.

Its weights are open and downloadable from Hugging Face (mit licence): you can run it on your own machines without sending your data to a third party. With 356,785,898,816 billion parameters, it needs about 199,369,657,123 GB of memory at 4-bit quantisation. Check with the VRAM calculator. It was downloaded 22,433 times on Hugging Face last month.

Other Z.ai (Zhipu) models

Average price per million tokens (3 input for 1 output).
ModelReleasedAvg. priceECI
GLM 5.3 PrimeSep 23, 2026$4.3—
GLM 5.3 FlashXSep 18, 2026$0.59—
GLM 5.3 FlashAug 26, 2026$0.24153.1
GLM 5.3Aug 18, 2026$0.41156
GLM 5.2Jun 16, 2026$1.78151.9
GLM 5.1Apr 7, 2026$2.15149.8
GLM 5V TurboApr 1, 2026$1.9—
GLM 5 TurboMar 15, 2026$1.9—

Verdict

GLM 4.6 scores 57/100 on our grid, which only uses published figures.

Strengths

  • Open weights: self-hostable, your data stays with you.
  • Agent-ready: tool calling and structured JSON output.

Limitations

  • No independent score published: performance cannot be verified.
  • Text only: reads neither images nor files.

Avoid if…

  • your tasks are mostly simple: a non-reasoning model will cost less;
  • you want to host it on a single consumer computer (≈ 199,369,657,123 GB needed at 4-bit).

Frequently asked questions

How much does GLM 4.6 cost?

$0.55 per million input tokens and $2.2 per million output tokens on OpenRouter (checked October 25, 2026). A task with 2,000 tokens read and 500 written costs $0.0022.

How big is GLM 4.6's context window?

204,800 tokens, roughly 154,000 words, with a maximum of 131,072 output tokens.

Can GLM 4.6 run locally?

Yes, its weights are published under the mit licence. Expect about 199,369,657,123 GB of memory at 4-bit.

Is GLM 4.6 suitable for an AI agent?

Technically yes: it supports tool calling and structured outputs. Then check its cost for your volume.

What are the alternatives to GLM 4.6?

The closest models on price and performance are Relace Apply 3, R1 0528, and Aion-3.0-Mini.

Related articles

Neutrality. No affiliate links. No vendor pays to be reviewed, rated or ranked. Reviews are directed by François Chollet, neutral and factual, and every data point is dated and sourced. How we score