Devin vs Claude Code: 2026 comparison

Devin and Claude Code in brief

Devin and Claude Code both help you change software, covering code edits, testing and error correction. Devin highlights planning changes, preparing pull requests and modernising older code. Claude Code provides a more explicit description of repository exploration, edits across multiple files and development commands. Their access arrangements also differ: Devin has a free offering, while Claude Code requires payment. Platform availability, export information and the level of detail about data hosting provide further practical distinctions, without establishing which tool writes better code.

Devin : Devin plans software changes, writes code and runs tests to correct errors. It serves people who want to work in existing repositories, prepare merge requests or modernize legacy code.

Claude Code : Claude Code supports developers in exploring and modifying code repositories. It can fix errors, edit multiple files for a task, write and run tests, execute development commands, and automate tasks with agents.

Both meet the same need, which makes the comparison useful. We compare them on 10 verifiable criteria, using the same data as their profiles, collected from official sites.

Comparison table

Criterion by criterion

For each criterion: why it matters, each one's value and who has the edge. A criterion without data on both sides is not decided.

Free tier

A free tier lets you test the tool on your own examples before paying anything. Devin : yes. Claude Code : no. Edge: Devin.

Entry price

The first paid plan, per month, gives the minimum cost of regular use; higher plans cost more. Devin : $20 per month. Claude Code : $200 per year. Edge: Claude Code.

Public API

An API lets you connect the tool to your software, an automation tool or an AI agent. Devin : yes. Claude Code : yes. A tie on this point.

Data export

Being able to get your content back avoids lock-in the day you want to switch tools. Devin : not disclosed. Claude Code : yes. Cannot be decided: data missing on one side.

Data hosting

Where data is stored matters for GDPR and client data: the EU or local processing make compliance simpler. Devin : not disclosed. Claude Code : several regions. Edge: Claude Code.

Interface languages

More interface languages make the tool easier to roll out across an international team. Devin : 1. Claude Code : 1. A tie on this point.

Platforms

The more platforms (web, desktop, mobile, extension), the better the tool fits your daily routine. Devin : web browser, API, Slack, and Microsoft Teams. Claude Code : web browser, Windows, macOS, Linux, iPhone and iPad, Android, Slack, and API. Edge: Claude Code.

Open source

Public code lets you audit the tool, self-host it and keep using it if the publisher changes course. Devin : no. Claude Code : no. A tie on this point.

Track record

A tool launched several years ago has a longer history: less risk of sudden shutdown, more user feedback. Devin : launched in 2024. Claude Code : launched in 2025. Edge: Devin.

Recognition

The number of reference community lists citing the tool shows how well known it is among practitioners. Devin : cited in 2 lists. Claude Code : cited in 1 list. Edge: Devin.

In charts

Our analysis

Devin describes a workflow extending from planning a software change to preparing a pull request. That emphasis suits a need to delegate a collection of tasks within an existing repository, including work on older code. Claude Code spells out repository operations more directly: exploring and explaining code, changing multiple files, running commands and writing tests. It also lists task automation with agents. Both products include testing and fixing errors in their documented capabilities. These descriptions help identify their intended roles, but they do not establish comparative autonomy, reliability or success rates. Your expected tasks remain more informative than assumptions drawn from their positioning.

Devin uses a freemium model and has a free offering. Its published entry price is USD 20 per month for the individual Pro plan, with possible additional charges for overages. Claude Code has no free offering in the supplied record. It is included in Claude Pro at USD 200 per year with annual billing, or USD 20 per month with monthly billing. API usage is billed separately according to consumption. These prices describe different access arrangements rather than a complete workload comparison. Included volumes and usage limits are not supplied, so the figures cannot establish which option would cost less for your tasks.

Both products are closed source and have US publishers. Those facts alone do not specify how repository contents are handled. Devin does not declare data hosting in the supplied record. Claude Code lists mixed hosting, without further detail about that arrangement. Retention periods, potential content reuse and contractual safeguards are not provided for either product. Claude Code documents exports in text, JSON and streaming JSON, whereas export information is unpublished for Devin. This gives you a clearer statement of Claude Code output formats. It does not demonstrate stronger privacy protections or establish that an entire project can be moved between services without limitations.

Devin lists web access, an API, Slack and Teams. Claude Code lists web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Slack and an API. Teams is therefore a documented entry point for Devin, while Claude Code covers a broader set of platforms in these records. Both list one interface language and no French interface. That information does not define the languages supported in conversations. The access and transparency scores are 56 for Devin and 58 for Claude Code. They provide context about access and published information, rather than measuring coding quality, task completion or the suitability of generated changes for your particular repository.

Depending on your situation

The right choice depends on use. For a few common situations, here are the criteria that matter and who wins (Devin value / Claude Code value).

Personal use on a tight budget

Neither stands out on the criteria for this situation (free tier (yes / no), entry price ($20 per month / $200 per year), and interface languages (1 / 1)): decide with a trial.

Business use with client data

Neither stands out on the criteria for this situation (data hosting (not disclosed / several regions), data export (not disclosed / yes), and track record (launched in 2024 / launched in 2025)): decide with a trial.

Integration with your software

Here, Claude Code has the edge: it wins 1 of the 3 criteria that matter in this situation, namely public api (yes / yes), open source (no / no), and platforms (web browser, API, Slack, and Microsoft Teams / web browser, Windows, macOS, Linux, iPhone and iPad, Android, Slack, and API).

Which one to choose?

Choose Devin if…

• you value free tier (yes)
• you value track record (launched in 2024)
• you value recognition (cited in 2 lists)

Devin fits when your priorities include planning changes, preparing pull requests or modernising existing code. Its Teams availability may matter if that is where your team works. A free offering provides an entry point without a paid subscription, although its limits are not supplied. If you use Pro, possible overage charges belong in your budget alongside the advertised monthly entry price.

Choose Claude Code if…

• you value entry price ($200 per year)
• you value data hosting (several regions)
• you value platforms (web browser, Windows, macOS, Linux, iPhone and iPad, Android, Slack, and API)

Claude Code fits repository exploration, changes across multiple files and development command execution. Its platform coverage may suit a varied working environment, while documented text and JSON exports offer concrete output options. Access requires payment, and API consumption has separate billing. It is a logical choice when those operations, platforms and formats match your needs, rather than because its score implies better code.

Strengths and limits of each

Devin

• + Free tier to try it
• + Public API
• + Available on many platforms
• − More expensive than its category median
• − Data hosting not disclosed

Claude Code

• + Public API
• + Available on many platforms
• − No free tier

The best test is still yours: take three real tasks from your day and give them to both for a week.

What about the others?

If neither suits you, look at Codex, aider, Kilo, GitHub Copilot, Amazon Q Developer, and OpenCode.

Related comparisons:

• Claude Code vs Codex
• Cursor vs Claude Code
• Claude Code vs Gemini CLI
• Aider vs Claude Code
• GitHub Copilot vs Claude Code
• OpenHands vs Claude Code

Conclusion

Devin aligns with planning, pull request preparation and Teams access. Claude Code aligns with explicitly listed repository operations, wider platform coverage and documented export formats. Your budget depends on the access route and actual consumption. The supplied information does not rank their programming quality or reliability. Choose according to the work you need to delegate, the interfaces you use and the data handling details your situation requires before adopting either service.